Skip to main content
Announcements
Live today at 11 AM ET. Get your questions about Qlik Connect answered, or just listen in. SIGN UP NOW
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
prahlad_infy
Partner - Creator II
Partner - Creator II

Screwed granularity , a measure needs to be conditionally aggregated and super manipulation needed

Hi All ,

I have a wired data  where a measure needs to be conditionally aggregated based on dimentionality and super manipulation of Total required in order to maintain correct Rating . 
Explaining through example : My source data is something like this , where at source itself data is aggregated and present as rows due to overall rating considerations .

D1.PNG

In above pic ,  Sq_Value of first record is actually aggregation of Sq_Value from second and third record ; but i overall rating is 

individual rating , hence cant be aggregated .

I want to achieve  a tabulation which is below on right side (Totals at right place , be it through script or expression)

d2.PNG

 

But partial sums are adding already aggregated values 

d3.PNG 

Not sure how to represent whole data where correct aggregation is retained with correct ranking . Guess this is too much for my level . Please suggest .

Thank you .

 

Source 

LOAD * INLINE [

City, AD1, AD2, AD3, Sq_Value, Overall_Rating
Chennai, Cant, Area A, , 60, 3
Chennai, Cant, Area A, Plot 1, 20, 8
Chennai, Cant, Area A, Plot 2, 40, 7
Chennai, Cant, Area B, Plot 1, 75, 6
Chennai, Cant, Area B, Plot 2, 25, 6
Chennai, Cant, Area B, Plot 3, 100, 3
Chennai, Cant, Area B, , 200, 8
Chennai, ECR, ECR Shore 1, , 25, 10
Chennai, ECR, ECR Shore 2, , 25, 7
Chennai, ECR, , , 50, 8
Chennai, , , , 260, 6
Hyderabad, , , , 100, 6
Bangalore, Bangalore East, , , 190, 8
Bangalore, Bangalore West, , , 50, 8
Mangalore , Mangalore East, , , 30, 4
Mangalore , Mangalore West, , , 55, 6
Bangalore, , , , 240, 3
Mangalore , , , , 85, 6
South, , , , 685, 8
];

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
sunny_talwar

9 Replies
prahlad_infy
Partner - Creator II
Partner - Creator II
Author

@tresesco  and @sunny_talwar  ... 

Adding two of the experts , who have given help to me earlier . 

sunny_talwar

I am confused... what is the issue? You already have 240 coming as the partial sum for Bangalore... why do you need another row?

image.png

prahlad_infy
Partner - Creator II
Partner - Creator II
Author

Hi Sunny ,

Actually data at source level itself has three rows , where one of the row has already aggregated data . And dat is actually causing the problem . 


sunny_talwar

But what is the problem?

prahlad_infy
Partner - Creator II
Partner - Creator II
Author

D4.PNG

prahlad_infy
Partner - Creator II
Partner - Creator II
Author

Sorry for leading to confusion . 

 The problem is when i show that in pivot table my total are getting wrong ...

d5.PNG

Actually the Total should come as 240 , instead of 480 . 

sunny_talwar

But isn't the 240 showed in the first row already your total? You want to show 2 totals? That would be confusing to the users?

prahlad_infy
Partner - Creator II
Partner - Creator II
Author

Yes Exactly , that is where i needed some sort of marker or highlight that the first row is actually total of next two rows . 

 

And precisely this is the reason i needed Total manipulation like table on right side . 

 

d2.PNG 

sunny_talwar

Check attached