Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Anonymous
Not applicable

Total function functionality in linest m function

Hi Team,

-->can we use variable in  in total<> Expression

like :total<$(zCyclic1)>

-->if it is possible then how can i implement in my bellow logic

linest_m(total <$(zCyclic1)> aggr($(mtotalpeople),$(zCyclic1),[Date]),[Date]),

----here $(zCyclic1) contains india--

---$(zCyclic1) --it contains country's list --depend upon users selection country will be change

if the above implementation is not possible then could you please provide different code for same calculation of linest_m

Regards,

Bobby.

12 Replies
swuehl
MVP
MVP

You should be able to use a field name list with the TOTAL qualifier, but not a field value list.

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Hay swuehl,

i agree that one

Old code is :

linest_m(total <india> aggr($(mtotalpeople),india,[Date]),[Date]),


but i need to implement  like below:

linest_m(total <$(zCyclic1)> aggr($(mtotalpeople),$(zCyclic1),[Date]),[Date]),


is it possible?


not possible can we have any similar functions like above one?(Linest m)


Regards,

Bobby



swuehl
MVP
MVP

In general, the dollar sign expansion is just a text replacement before the expression even gets evaluated.

So if the DSE is exactely just replaced with india, this should work well.

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Hi Swuehl,

i tired my self since last few days but til now i didn"t get any solution

please look the attached qvw file.

in that i mention my requirement as well as sample data

please look on that and

kind regards,

Bobby

swuehl
MVP
MVP

Are you sure this is the right sample QVW?

I can't see any dimension groups in your application.

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Hi

swuehl
MVP
MVP

You can use  GetCurrentField( DimensionGroup ) to retrieve the current active field from your dimension group.

I created a variable to do this vDimGroup1.

Then replace your hard coded dimensions in the linest_m total and aggr() with that variable, as I've done for the first table.

Second table should be quite analogue.

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

hi

and

-->dimensionality level2,3 issues i mentioned in QVW file



let me know if you need more information on this


regards,

bob

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

hi