Skip to main content
Announcements
Qlik Connect 2024! Seize endless possibilities! LEARN MORE
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

server performance publisher

Hi togehter,

i have got a performance problem on our qlikviewserver and need advice.
Meanwhile, our data model has grown up to 1.5 GB . The data model
fed by three different systems. It consists mostly of the production data that compared over several years for qlikview-BI.

As we carry out evaluations across all systems, we invite by the "binary" command the entire data model to feed any qlikview application.

In our case we have approximately 20 applications that are each charged separately by the binary command with identical data model.

You can imagine that it is quite to the hardware resources . Too long load times or extremely slow execution of the published applications .

The idea is to divide he data model into small pieces and load only the data that are needed for the current application. Can I load in a QlikView application several small binaries ? Or how do I realize it so I do not always load the giant data model in every qlikView application ?

Thank you very much !

Regards,



1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
johnw
Champion III
Champion III

I would store each table as a separate QVD.  I would also join (or applymap) small helper tables onto your large fact tables so as to avoid having too many QVDs.  When loading from QVD, load only the fields you need, and where at all practical, use an optimized load.  QVDs are a very, very common approach.  So common that I worry I've misunderstood the question. 

View solution in original post

1 Reply
johnw
Champion III
Champion III

I would store each table as a separate QVD.  I would also join (or applymap) small helper tables onto your large fact tables so as to avoid having too many QVDs.  When loading from QVD, load only the fields you need, and where at all practical, use an optimized load.  QVDs are a very, very common approach.  So common that I worry I've misunderstood the question.