Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Anonymous
Not applicable

Datamodel problem loop

I have 3 tables which in a 'normal' datamodel are connected like this following:


ServiceOrders
Serviceordernr
CustomerID
..

Calls
Callnr
Serviceordernr

CustomerID
..
Customer
CustomerID

..



In QlikView this results in a loop ...

I want to show some things from the Customer view ... but also from Call and ServiceOrder view.

Problem I have is that a Call not always has a Serviceordernr ... and not all Serviceorders belong to a Call.

So when connecting the table Customer to Call I miss the information for customers on Serviceorder view.
When connecting the table Serviceorder to the information I miss the information for customers on Call view.

Don't know a practical way of solving this... anyone has suggestions??

I don't want to have the same Customer table twice (ofcourse with different naming) ... for selections in the same report this gives confusing situations ... and that is exactly what we don't want. I just want to choose once a CustomerID.

It is not possible to connect the tables ServiceOrders and Calls otherwise, since there are a lot of other tables involved too.

Anita

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
johnw
Champion III
Champion III

This would actually change your data, so may not be what you want. But how about using the customer AS the order item when there's no order item in the call table. Add the customers to the order item table with a different order item type like 'customer call without order item'. You could then remove customer from the call table.

View solution in original post

4 Replies
Not applicable
Author

JOIN the ServiceOrders and Calls tables.

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

This is exactly what we don't want, since these are two seperate objects we seperately use ...

If we join the two tables this means we need a lot of set analysis on the front-end to be sure to see the correct data ...

johnw
Champion III
Champion III

This would actually change your data, so may not be what you want. But how about using the customer AS the order item when there's no order item in the call table. Add the customers to the order item table with a different order item type like 'customer call without order item'. You could then remove customer from the call table.

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Did try to put the tables in one table ... but as I suspected (and you mentioned it also) this changes our data ... Something we want to avoid.

Since the report we where building is used for 2 different purposes which could be splitted up we decided to create 2 seperate reports.
This also takes away the problem which occurred ...

The first report now zooms in onto Calls - ServiceOrders and the second report on ServiceOrders (no Calls here). This way we don't have the problems we had ... and for our customers the reports are more clear since the goals of each report is now crystal clear ... Idea

For future problems (did walk into this problems several times) I'll keep this in mind ...

Thx for the effort.