Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi Expert,
I have some tIntervalMatch in the job, the example is just like the flow in picture below. (but actually not only 2 intervalComponents lookup, but around 4 or 5 Lookups with Range Value.)
Since I have more than one tIntervalMatch side by side, I Opened the first tInterval and seems like everythings seems normal and nothing so weird.
In the output schema, I can see the LOOKUP output column as new added column.
--> My 1st Question, "How do I rename the "LOOKUP" output name?" The one which green colored by TOS.
Okay, on my second tIntervalMatch I opened and found below screenshot. Since the output can't be rename, from my understanding, seems like the Output of 2nd tIntervalMatch are going to be overwritten by my 1st tIntervalMatch Output. I just assumed, because the name are same.
--> My 2nd Question, How do we deal with this kind of flow? What should we do if we have more than 1 tIntervalMatch in the flow.
I was thinking to put tMap between each of tIntervalMatch only for mapping and rename the output. But based on the performance wise, I don't think that is a correct idea, since I have around 4 to 5 tIntervalMatch. I would be ended with adding another 5 tMaps if using that approach.
Please kindly your solution.
Thanks!!
I have some tIntervalMatch in the job, the example is just like the flow in picture below. (but actually not only 2 intervalComponents lookup, but around 4 or 5 Lookups with Range Value.)
Since I have more than one tIntervalMatch side by side, I Opened the first tInterval and seems like everythings seems normal and nothing so weird.
In the output schema, I can see the LOOKUP output column as new added column.
--> My 1st Question, "How do I rename the "LOOKUP" output name?" The one which green colored by TOS.
Okay, on my second tIntervalMatch I opened and found below screenshot. Since the output can't be rename, from my understanding, seems like the Output of 2nd tIntervalMatch are going to be overwritten by my 1st tIntervalMatch Output. I just assumed, because the name are same.
--> My 2nd Question, How do we deal with this kind of flow? What should we do if we have more than 1 tIntervalMatch in the flow.
I was thinking to put tMap between each of tIntervalMatch only for mapping and rename the output. But based on the performance wise, I don't think that is a correct idea, since I have around 4 to 5 tIntervalMatch. I would be ended with adding another 5 tMaps if using that approach.
Please kindly your solution.
Thanks!!
