Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Good day!
Colleagues, i need to consult with you about order and priorities of applying filters in any expr.
As i know, expressions calculating can react to three sources of filters:
1. Current selection
2. Bookmark filter
3. Inside field filter
4. Searching inside field filter
Some example:
sum({[Bookmark filter] <City={[Inside field filter]}, Delivery_point={"=Searching inside field filter "} >}sales)
As far as i understand, these ways for liltering have such orders and priorities:
1.Searching inside field filter - First in order, first priority
2.Inside field filter - Second in order, second priority
3.Bookmark filter - Third in order, third priority
4.Current selection - Fourth in order, fourth priority
Could you correct me please, if i write some wrong?
Many thanks.
It would be interesting to know if there is such an order of priority. AFAIK there isn't any priority.
Thanks, dear)
Interesting question.
I would rather look at this like the set identifier / bookmark in combination with the field modifiers define a set as a whole.
Is there an priority / order in applying the field modifier to the base set identifier? I don't think so, and I believe it shouldn't.
As it shouldn't make a difference to the aggregation result if you make a manual selection in field A before you make a selection in B compared to first B, then A.
What do you think? Have you any hints that there is a priority in applying filter?
Regards,
Stefan