Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi all,
I have made a small example of the problem I'm running into:
This is my script:
Basis:
Load * Inline
[ID, Type, Selectie, Selectie2ID
0,1,A,1
1,1,A,1
2,1,A,1
3,2,A,1
4,2,A,1
5,3,A,1
5,3,A,1
5,3,A,1
5,3,A,1
6,1,B,2
7,1,B,2
8,1,B,2
9,2,B,2
10,2,B,2
11,3,B,2
12,3,B,2
13,3,B,2
14,3,B,2];
det:
load * inline
[Selectie2ID, Selectie2Name
1, A
2, B];
If I now create a chart where I use set statement to count the number of ID's based on their type and use "Selectie" as a dimension, it works as expected.
He shows me the amount of ID's that have type 1.
If I change this now and use "Selectie2Name" as a dimension, I would expect the same result. But he shows me a different graph.
The example qvw is attached.
Should there be an expression that works in both graphs or should I search for a different solution in the second graph?
What would be the solution for the second graph and also, why is there a difference ?
Tia !
hei
attach is your answer
i changed the expression in the second chart to
Count({$<Type=-{1}>} ID)
hei
attach is your answer
i changed the expression in the second chart to
Count({$<Type=-{1}>} ID)
Hi, Thanks for the answer !
But the question I have now:
what is the difference between
count( {$ - <Type = {1}>} ID
and
count( {$ <Type = - {1} >} ID
Or is the first one just improper use of set statement?
hei
the first one exclude all the values of Type=1 in the model so as you have type=1 so now this values are excluded from the field value totaly,like they dont exists
the seconed one is the proper one