Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
I already know that what I want to achieve is not possible using Section Access, but describing the issue with reference to section access seams easiest.
Data Source: HR
Section Access Field Reduction: EmployeeID
Section Access OMIT Field: SalaryAmount
I need to cater for the following scenarios:
As I said – I am aware that OMIT will hide the field (or not) for the user on all records or none.
The question: can anyone think of a way to achieve the goal keeping the following in mind:
Hi Jarno,
forget about the OMIT. What you really want is to reduce the Sales Table differently from the Employee Table. Therefore you need a Link Table for your different Rights like this:
Hope this helps.
Regards Tobias
If you have Publisher, you can reduce the application on bookmark of your choice. The reduced application doesn't contain left out values(literally 'reduced' ).
The problem I have is not hiding rows, but hiding (OMIT) a field, for certain rows. See scenario 4 in my problem statement.
Hi
Have a look at these blog posts:
Data Reduction Using Multiple Fields
http://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/11/25/hierarchy-authorization
Basics for complex authorization
They should help you find the correct approach.
HTH
Jonathan
Perhaps I misunderstand your post, but I fail to see how any of those links will help me achieve my scenario 4 in the problem statement?
Let me restate the issue:
How do I show a user a SalaryValue field for certain employees, but not for others. It is not about hiding the row as the employee must still exist in the reduced dataset, but the SalaryValue field must be available on only some of the rows in the users already reduced dataset.
Hi Jarno,
forget about the OMIT. What you really want is to reduce the Sales Table differently from the Employee Table. Therefore you need a Link Table for your different Rights like this:
Hope this helps.
Regards Tobias
Hi Tobias,
Thank you - I will test and report back!
Hi Tobias,
It works - Thank you!!