Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
I have a pivot table that I am trying to cumulate the sum of rows for YTD Tonnes and Margin %.
I need it to look like below:
I use these for a normal straight table.
RangeSum(Before(TOTAL Sum({<FYMonth>}Tonnes), 0, Rowno(TOTAL)))
and
RangeSum(Above(TOTAL Sum({<FYMonth>}Margin), 0, Rowno(TOTAL)))
/Rangesum(Above(TOTAL Sum({<FYMonth>}Sales), 0, Rowno(TOTAL)))
I have tried this for the pivot table but it is not working. I have also tried “Before” rather than “After”.
RangeSum(After(TOTAL Sum({<FYMonth>}Tonnes), 0, ColumnNo()))
And
RangeSum(After(TOTAL Sum({<FYMonth>}Margin), 0, ColumnNo(TOTAL)))
/Rangesum(After(TOTAL Sum({<FYMonth>}Sales), 0, ColumnNo(TOTAL)))
Anyone experiencing high latency after the switch to Standard Time last weekend? Any suggestions on how to resolve? We just upgraded to Replicate version May 2026 a couple of weeks ago. Thank you!
Are there any videos, demos, or demonstrated use case for using Talend Data Catalog and showing its use and capabilities instead of the learning paths on learning portal?
Setup
We created a Mixpanel connector pointing to our Mixpanel project, configured with:
What we observed
We triggered a manual run to load the historical data. That run continued for 24 hours without completing the historical sync, and was still in progress when the next scheduled run was triggered.
The following day's run did not resume from where the previous run stopped. It started again from the beginning and attempted to load the entire year of historical data from scratch. This repeated for several days. On some days the Mixpanel API errored partway through, which also forced the next run to restart from the beginning.
Impact
Across those few days, more than one billion rows were loaded, the large majority of which are duplicates of the same historical data re-ingested on each run. The connector never advanced far enough to reach current data.
What we would like to understand
Good afternoon, community.
I am creating a report in which I am using a `ValueList` within my dimension—for example: `ValueList('RESULTADO 2026', 'VS 2025', 'VS KPI 2026')
And in my measure, I include this formula:
=If(
ValueList(
'RESULTADO 2026',
'VS 2025',
'VS KPI 2026'
) = 'RESULTADO 2026',
Num(Sum({<Mes=,Año = {'$(vAñoActual)'},fecha = {"<=$(vMaxFechaActual)"}>} Numero_Entradas),'#,##0'),
If(
ValueList(
'RESULTADO 2026',
'VS 2025',
'VS KPI 2026'
) = 'VS 2025',
Num((Sum({<Mes=,Año={'$(vAñoActual)'},fecha = {"<=$(vMaxFechaActual)"}>} Numero_Entradas) - Sum({<Mes=,Año={'$(vAñoAnterior)'},fecha = {"<=$(vMaxFechaAnterior)"}>} Numero_Entradas))
/Sum({<Mes=,Año={'$(vAñoAnterior)'},fecha = {"<=$(vMaxFechaAnterior)"}>} Numero_Entradas),'0.0%'),
Num((Sum({<Mes=,Año={'$(vAñoActual)'},fecha = {"<=$(vMaxFechaActual)"}>} Numero_Entradas)/Sum({<Mes=,Año={'$(vAñoActual)'},fecha = {"<=$(vMaxFechaActual)"}>}Total_Presupuesto)),'0%')
)
)
If I don’t select a specific month, my results appear correctly in the report. However, if I select a month—for example, September—the data for September is displayed correctly, but the data for the preceding months is shown as percentages instead of the correct values.
The measure I am using represents a cumulative total from January to September.
How can I ensure that, when I select a specific month, the data for the unselected months is also displayed correctly?
I have attached images showing how my report looks.
I look forward to your suggestions.
Thanks.
Hi all,
In Qlik Cloud Analytics I created a data alert that triggers when the supplier changes for an item-warehouse combination. The alert works, but the View in application link in the notification fails to apply the selection.
Setup
Problem
Clicking View in application opens the app and shows:
“A field you are trying to make a selection in could not be found. The selection has not been applied.”
Link generated from the alert - .../sheet/<sheetId>/bookmark/<bookmarkId>/select/[ItemWarehouseKey]/400000021000001-1CH
What I tested
Questions
Hi Qlik Community,
¡IMPORTANT!
If you are on QAP and leverage anonymous authentication, do NOT upgrade to May 2026 Initial Release.
We have upgraded one of our TEST environments and noticed this issue:
even if the Virtual Proxy is configured to Allow Anonymous Users, they are being prompted for authentication.
So, please check your virtual proxy configuration before upgrading, or wait for the fix.
The Virtual proxies that are configured as Always anonymous users are working as expected.
@Giuseppe_Novello | @Sonja_Bauernfeind | @Ray_Strother
@Eduardo_Monteiro | @SergioProba | @kauenascimento | @AnaSilva
Background:
1. Qlik Sense Core-Based License: Embedded Qlik Charts and Dashboards on their website (mashups).
2. Current Web Frontend:
- Mashups
- RequireJS v2.3.6
- NuxtJS v2
- Capability APIs v1.8 (Qlik Sense API)
Questions:
1. Can the website be developed to use the Visual Exploration menu on the customer’s website? (Images from customer as attached)
2. If yes, is it necessary to write additional functions? What are the steps involved?
3. If not, what APIs are currently in use, or which ones can be recommended to enable the use of the Visual Exploration menu?
Hi Support,
In the GetTableStatuses QEM API call which monitors Replicate tasks, there are 3 metrics returned in the response body called cached_insert_count, cached_update_count and cached_delete_count.
I'd just like to understand the meaning of these metrics further. Do the counts represent the inserts/updates/deletes that have been picked up from the source and are yet to be applied to the target (i.e. in flight changes)? Or are they a historical count of all cached inserts/updates/deletes?
Thanks,
Nak
Qlik is a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Data Integration Tools
See how agentic AI is changing business intelligence and analytics teams, and why trusted data and shared context matter most.
Here’s your agentic AI readiness check. (Got Qlik? You're closer than you think.)
Built for the builders: Modern data engineering is AI powered — and engineer led.
The pilot-to-production gap is real. From fragmented data to governance gaps Qlik and AWS break down what’s holding your enterprise AI back — and how to solve them.
Your journey awaits! Join us by Logging in and let the adventure begin.