Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi to everyone,
After upgrading Qlik Sense for Windows to the release May 2026 Patch 3, when I try to open the Load Script for any published app, I can't. The option "Load Script Editor" is missing. This option was present for the release Nov 2025 Patch 6.
I tried to create new rules to permit it with no luck.
I know, that the way can be to duplicate the app, and see the script, but I would like to know if this behaviour was set by design, and any workaround can't be set via security rules, or so on, or if it's possible.
Was anyone able to set the behaviour I'm missing? if so, can you explain me how to set it?
Thanks in advance
Thanks
Hi team,
I tried to set up this LLM but currently, to make the test with Swagger on Power Automate to authorize the OAuth session, it indicates that the redirect URI is not registered, and I made this in the before steps.
Some have the same problem or know other steps to work with Qlik Cloud MCP and Copilot.
Thanks
I'd like to check whether the architecture below is supported and recommended, or whether we should change it.
Environment
- QlikView Server (May 2026)
- Qlik NPrinting May 2026 SR1: 1 NPrinting Server and about 11 NPrinting Engines
- QMS and DSC on one server, with a clustered Publisher
Design
- Cluster A (2 QVS nodes) serves end users through AccessPoint on QVWS #1. Users open the documents and trigger NPrinting On-Demand from there.
- Cluster B (3 QVS nodes) is dedicated to NPrinting. The NPrinting connections point to Cluster B through QVWS #2 (qmss://QMS:4799/QVWS@web2/...), with CPU usage load balancing.
- Both clusters mount the same document folders on the same file share, so they share the same .qvw and .Shared files.
Please elaborate on your input, and thanks in advance!
Dear Support Team,
I am writing to request clarification regarding the behavior of the use_manipulation_pk_for_apply parameter and an apparent discrepancy between our test results and the current documentation.
1. Current Documentation
According to the manual, to enable this feature, the parameter should either be:
Removed (unset), or
Explicitly set to OFF.
2. Observed Behavior / Verification Results
Based on our internal testing, the actual behavior appears to contradict what is stated in the documentation:
When use_manipulation_pk_for_apply is unset or set to ON: If a configuration exists to arrange primary key (PK) values in a specific order, the system appears to attempt to reorder and apply them according to that sequence.
When set to OFF: This reordering process does not seem to be triggered.
New Task Comparison: Based on our observation, the reason this unexpected behavior does not occur in newly created tasks seems to be simply that no specific PK ordering has been configured for them.
Therefore, our verification suggests that the feature is actually enabled when the parameter is unset or set to ON, rather than OFF.
3. Questions / Confirmation
Could you please confirm the following points?
Is the statement in the manual incorrect, and should it state that the feature is enabled when set to ON (or unset)?
If the manual is correct and setting the parameter to OFF is indeed the intended specification to enable the feature, is the observed behavior where ON triggers this process considered a defect/bug?
We would appreciate your clarification on the intended behavior and documentation.
Best regards.
This Techspert Talks session covers:
Chapters:
Resources:
Click here to see the video transcript
I have a table that currently works - it allows the user to select WeekStartShipDate, which is loaded in the load script with a Floor value, filtering the table to just one week:
The variables vStartSixWk and vEndSixWk determine the date range for the 6 Week column.
vStartSixWk =(WeekStartShipDate) -42
vEndSixWk =(WeekStartShipDate)
The 6 Week column is then calculated as follows:
Sum({<WeekEndShipDate={">=$(vStartSixWk)<=$(vEndSixWk)"}>} EquivalentUnits) / 6
The % of 6Wk Total column is calculated as follows:
Num(
Sum({<WeekEndShipDate={">=$(vStartSixWk)<=$(vEndSixWk)"}>} EquivalentUnits) / 6
/
Sum(
TOTAL
Aggr(
Sum({<WeekEndShipDate={">=$(vStartSixWk)<=$(vEndSixWk)"}>} EquivalentUnits) / 6,
ShipTo
)
),
'##0.0%'
)
So, that all works fine until I add another dimension column, such as SalesOrder. Once I do that, the date filter breaks, and the 6 Week expressions return zeroes.
Please advise.
Hello,
We have been using the Answers Analyzer monitoring application (provided by Qlik) for a few months now, and everything has been working as expected.
But since Qlik Answers 2.0, we don’t have any data in the monitoring app regarding all assistants created using the new design (not legacy). At the moment, we’re only using unstructured data, but we’d find it useful to have the questions and answers for assistants that work with an app and structured data as well.
Is an update to this app planned?
Or is there another way to retrieve the questions and answers asked of a ‘new’ assistant?
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Florian
One of users have created new columns not existing in source but added on the target table. They are seeing NULLS overriding the values in these columns. Is there anyway to exclude writing data to these columns in Qlik Replicate.
FYI - We are using May 2025 Replicate
Appreciate your assistance !
Thank you,
Pranathi Yerragudi
Qlik nPrinting upgrade from February 2024 sr1 to May 2026 sr2 creating issues.
Updtaed fine but at the first startup looks like I have communication issues between the engine and Rabbit.
Windows server 2019 and all running on same machine.
For example opening connections list, is blank and spinning and loading for ever.
Not sure someone else has same problems. Same issue if I try to upgrade to February 2025.
Log attached.
Navigation Deferring platform decisions? The Qlik Open Lakehouse Calculator puts a real cost to the status quo.
Qlik is a Leader in the IDC Events/Global Events MarketScape: Worldwide Data Intelligence Platform Software 2026 Vendor Assessment
Here’s your agentic AI readiness check. (Got Qlik? You're closer than you think.)
Built for the builders: Modern data engineering is AI powered — and engineer led.
The pilot-to-production gap is real. From fragmented data to governance gaps Qlik and AWS break down what’s holding your enterprise AI back — and how to solve them.
Your journey awaits! Join us by Logging in and let the adventure begin.