Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi
How do I apply a filter (by selection in table) to all states in an Alternate set?
Is it by design that I can't filter rows if I'm using alternate set, or am I doing something wrong?If i'm using alternate set in measures the table doesn't narrow down to selected values anymore. If I'm removing the column using alternate set it behaves as expected.
This is the measure causing confusion
Sum({[Old Snapshot]}QTY)
This does not affect the table
Sum(QTY)
My plan was to use Alternate set as a way to find discrepancies between two snapshots (New Snapshot - Old Snapshot), but usability is a pain if drilldown in all other dimensions has to be coordinated manually. ( I can drill down if I use separate filters assigned to each state). It's also a risk if someone misses one filter on one of the dimensions.
Some data to play around with
Data:
Load * Inline [
Name , Dept , Worked , Snapshot , QTY
Anne , A , 2023-05 , 2023-08 , 100
Ben , A , 2023-05 , 2023-08 , 100
Charlie , C , 2023-05 , 2023-08 , 100
Dina , C , 2023-05 , 2023-08 , 100
Anne , A , 2023-06 , 2023-08 , 100
Ben , A , 2023-06 , 2023-08 , 100
Charlie , C , 2023-06 , 2023-08 , 100
Dina , C , 2023-06 , 2023-08 , 100
Anne , A , 2023-07 , 2023-08 , 100
Ben , A , 2023-07 , 2023-08 , 100
Charlie , C , 2023-07 , 2023-08 , 100
Dina , C , 2023-07 , 2023-08 , 100
Anne , A , 2023-05 , 2023-09 , 100
Ben , A , 2023-05 , 2023-09 , 100
Charlie , C , 2023-05 , 2023-09 , 110
Dina , C , 2023-05 , 2023-09 , 100
Anne , A , 2023-06 , 2023-09 , 100
Ben , A , 2023-06 , 2023-09 , 110
Charlie , C , 2023-06 , 2023-09 , 100
Dina , C , 2023-06 , 2023-09 , 100
Anne , A , 2023-07 , 2023-09 , 100
Ben , A , 2023-07 , 2023-09 , 110
Charlie , C , 2023-07 , 2023-09 , 100
Dina , C , 2023-07 , 2023-09 , 100
];