Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi anyone,
In one record, it contains a regular DB field and an XML content DB field. The regular DB field contains the key and would like to merge it with the XML content DB field.
Example:
INPUT
Regular Field XML Field
999999 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?> .....
999998 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?> .....
OUTPUT (Merged)
XML Field
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?><Key> 999999 </Key>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?><Key> 999998 </Key>
Do you have a solution for it? Thanks for your help!
Not sure if i am missing something here...it should be simple. The only catch in the solution i am proposing is i am writing to a file, you may have to extrapolate to an xml... i can not write to an xml because i don't know what your output xml looks like.
Hi,
I am expecting to insert the DB postgres column 1 to column 2 (xml format). Example is below:
INPUT (DB Postgres)
Column 1 Column 2 (in XML format)
999999 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?> <procedure_nbr>82.111111</procedure_nbr> ....
999998 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?> <procedure_nbr>82.222222</procedure_nbr> ....
OUTPUT (DB Postgres)
Column 1 Column 2 (in XML format)
999999 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?> <key>999999</key> <procedure_nbr>82.111111</procedure_nbr> ....
999998 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?> <key>999998</key> <procedure_nbr>82.222222</procedure_nbr> ....
tnewbie's solution is pretty close. Basically, you are smuggling in a new XML tag into a string - not pretty but can be effective. Instead of
row1.xmlfield+"<KEY> "+row.dbfield+" </key>"
you should use (exactly like this, assuming xmlField and dbField are never null)
row1.xmlField.replaceFirst(">", "><key>" + row1.dbField + "</key>")
Please accept my advice: always pay attention to case sensitivity (e.g. KEY vs. key) - it might bite you later in places or at times you did not expect. I have been there.