Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hello,
in set analysis I want to ignore active filter but not variable base on filter.
I try to ignore Dealer, but Dealer define variable vDistrictDealer. Do you have same idea for this?
Max(Aggr(Sum({< Fakt = {'Def'}, Year = {"$(=Year(vMaxDatZap))"}, [District] = {'$(vDistrictDealer)'}, Dealer= >}[#Reg]), [District],[Brand]))
Thank you
whats your vDistrictDealer expression look like?
vDistrictDealer = District_short .... for example BA or BB or CA etc.
And District_short and Dealer are columns in dimension table Dealer.
when you say 'I try to ignore Dealer, but Dealer define variable vDistrictDealer. '- you want to ignore Dealer selections in vDistrictDealer = District_short too?
I use filter for Dealer e.g. Dealer1. After that vDistrictDealer will value e.g. AB.
In my expression I want to Sum #Reg where District is AB, but I want to Sum #Reg for all dealers not only for Dealer1.
Max(Aggr(Sum({< Fakt = {'Def'}, Year = {"$(=Year(vMaxDatZap))"}, [District] = {'$(vDistrictDealer)'}, Dealer= >}[#Reg]), [District],[Brand]))
then why dont you try:
Max(Aggr(Sum({< Fakt = {'Def'}, Year = {"$(=Year(vMaxDatZap))"}, Dealer= >}[#Reg]), [District],[Brand]))
this sums up all while excluding Dealer selections
It ignores District AB, so it sums all regs for each district and returns max value. But I need only sum for District AB. Others districts are unimportant.
Max(Aggr(Sum({< Fakt = {'Def'}, Year = {"$(=Year(vMaxDatZap))"}, [District] = {'AB'}, Dealer= >}[#Reg]), [District],[Brand]))
This sums up all [#Reg] for just [District] = {'AB'} while ignoring any selections on Dealer.
i would suggest to give a sample data and an expected output view, that would reduce all these clarifications.