Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi everyone,
I have problem with the use of operande ">" with Dates.
Even if I can use it with numerics values, it doesn't work with dates for me.
I want sales after a certain year or between certain years
but :
Sum({$<[Date.autoCalendar.Year]={">2000"}>}SALES)
Or even :
Sum({$<[Date.autoCalendar.Year]={">2000<2019"}>}SALES)
Are not working...
But surprisingly :
Sum({$<[Date.autoCalendar.Year]={"2000"}>}Sales)
Is working and give me sales of year 2000
Also, I think my problem with the comparators "< and >" are only wih dates... I tried with other values that contains figures and it works...but it should work with years as well as it is one of the precise example on the "help" documents no ?
Do you have an idea where the problem can come from ?
I don't see anything wrong with your expression. My guess is this has to do with it being a derived field. Here are a couple things I would do to test:
1. Create a filter pane with [Date.autoCalendar.Year] as the dimension. In the search box, if you enter '>2000', do the results match what you expect?
2. Try creating a field in your data model: Year(Date) as Year. Then try using that in your set analysis instead.
3. Try >=2001. This is a long shot but worth a quick try.
I don't see anything wrong with your expression. My guess is this has to do with it being a derived field. Here are a couple things I would do to test:
1. Create a filter pane with [Date.autoCalendar.Year] as the dimension. In the search box, if you enter '>2000', do the results match what you expect?
2. Try creating a field in your data model: Year(Date) as Year. Then try using that in your set analysis instead.
3. Try >=2001. This is a long shot but worth a quick try.
Hi,
The filter pane didn't work (Always selected every years)... BUT : I added a new field as you said and I works.
Thanks a lot for your help. Nevertheless, surprised I doesn't work with "auto" fonction... This will force me to build lot of added field in the data base ...
But thanks a lot for your solution !!