Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Qlik Open Lakehouse is Now Generally Available! Discover the key highlights and partner resources here.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Need a calculation with set analysis that doesn't take into account some (selected) fields

I have a complex task and a trouble with it. Simplifying the data let's assume I have a table of companies of several types. Each company has a personal manager. I also have a table of powers of attorney given by the companies to some representatives. There are several types of POAs. Not all the companies have given a POA. I need to construct a calculation that counts for earch manager a number of total companies (TC) and a number of those, that have given a POA (GP). When I click and choose a type of POA the GP values should change, but the TC values should remain. But when I click and choose the type of company both values should change respectively. So I need the calculation that ignores some fields selection, but takes into account the others. Thanks in advance!

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
maxgro
MVP
MVP

I'm a bit confused but, just to start

Qlik takes into account every field (if they are associated in the data model) when you click;

to ignore some selections you can use set analysis

example:

you have this expression for TC

Count(DISTINCT CID)

if you want to ignore PTYPE (type of POA as I understand from your question) the expression is

Count({$ <PTYPE=>} DISTINCT CID)

View solution in original post

2 Replies
maxgro
MVP
MVP

I'm a bit confused but, just to start

Qlik takes into account every field (if they are associated in the data model) when you click;

to ignore some selections you can use set analysis

example:

you have this expression for TC

Count(DISTINCT CID)

if you want to ignore PTYPE (type of POA as I understand from your question) the expression is

Count({$ <PTYPE=>} DISTINCT CID)

Not applicable
Author

Thanks! I seem to miss it when was reading about SA...