Hi everyone,
I need to calculate the mesoure below:
=count( DISTINCT{<Estado={'Desactivado'}>} [ID Recurso] )/count( DISTINCT [ID Recurso] )
My problem is that I need to ignore ALL the selections except one(for example, Field_1). I have many fields that can be selected and I cant set each one.
Is there anything i can do to avoid all the selections but the Field_1?
Appreciate your help!
Thanks,
I would prefer a simpler one (until someone points out a glitch).
=Count( {1<Field_1=$::Field_1>} YourField)
Credit : bwisenoSimenKG
And please be careful,
=Count( {1<Field_1=p(Field_1)>} YourField) , might give you wrong result, because the possible values of Field_1 are still getting affected by other selections, which you don't want.
Try this:
=Count( DISTINCT{1<Estado={'Desactivado'}, Field_1 = p(Field1)>} [ID Recurso] )/count( DISTINCT {1<Field_1 = p(Field1)>} [ID Recurso] )
there is a good doc about your question here
Ignore all selections except some specific fields using Set Analysis
Expression given by Sunny T works. but there is one caveat here, if you have a selection on Field_2 which is associated to Field_1 and only 3 (just example) of them are available for the selection, Field_1 =p(Field_1) while have only 3 possible values for Field_1. If you wanted to ignore all selections except Field_1 you will have to ignore all other fields in the possible set of field_1. like below
Field_1 = p({<all fields except Field_1>}Field_1)
to get the all fields except Field_1 :
in the variable definitions window
vField_1Exclusions = Concat(Distinct '['& if(Not WildMatch([$Field],'Field_1'),[$Field]&']',','))
Field_1 = p({<$(vField_1Exclusions)>}Field_1)
Thanks for your help!
I tried it and it worked!
I would prefer a simpler one (until someone points out a glitch).
=Count( {1<Field_1=$::Field_1>} YourField)
Credit : bwisenoSimenKG
And please be careful,
=Count( {1<Field_1=p(Field_1)>} YourField) , might give you wrong result, because the possible values of Field_1 are still getting affected by other selections, which you don't want.
tresesco so you are saying that if we have this -> {1<Field_1 = p(Field_1)>} it can change with selection in Field_2 if they are somehow linked together?
I was under the impression that it won't, would you be able to share a sample where it doesn't work.
Thanks,
Sunny
Wow you are right, I have using this p thing for a while without knowing this thing. Thanks tresesco for bringing this to my notice. Really appreciate.
Please find attached a sample where other might be able to see an example.
Best,
Sunny
I thought that this would be better if I could make a document for the same and just did that here: