Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Qlik Open Lakehouse is Now Generally Available! Discover the key highlights and partner resources here.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Using set expression in a graph dimension

Hi everybody,

I have a graph with time as dimension and the following formula as expression:

count(DISTINCT

                    {$

                     <

                          Project=

                         ,[Project Type]=

                         ,[Project Category]={"Execution"}

                         ,SA_PER_ORG_P={"EMP"}

                       >

                        +

                       <

                          [Project Category] = {"Potential"}

                          ,SA_PER_ORG_P={"EMP"}

                        >

                     } 

        EMPLID_RD)

The formula counts the distinct Employee ID  considering the intersection of the two set defined in the set expression (red and blue).

I need to display a table (pivot table, linear table) with the list of the distinct emplid counted in the formula for a single month, with their properties. 

Due to set expression in the formula, the list of possible EMPLID (white EMPLID) is different from the list i would like to obtain. 

Do you have any suggestion to obtain my target list?

I tried to use set expression as dimension of a graph but it didn't work.

I thougth to use alternate state, but i can simulate only one of two state defined in the set expression.

Thanks in advance,

Giampaolo

3 Replies
v_iyyappan
Specialist
Specialist

Hi,

Use this expression like this

count( {$ <  Project=,

               [Project Type]=,

               [Project Category]={"Execution","Potential"} ,

               SA_PER_ORG_P={"EMP"} >

     DISTINCT   EMPLID_RD)

Regards,

Iyyappan

Not applicable
Author

Hi,

The problem is not in the expression, it works fine.

I need to display the list of EMPLID counted by the Expression.

Thanks,

Giampaolo

Not applicable
Author

Hi everybody,

Somebody has any idea?

Thanks

Giampaolo