Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Independent validation for trusted, AI-ready data integration. See why IDC named Qlik a Leader: Read the Excerpt!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
damien_burns
Contributor II
Contributor II

load order of apply maps

Hi

 

I am running QLikview 12.2 alongside 12.4 for testing purposes.

In my reports there are small differences which I have traced back to the order in which some apply maps are loaded.

In there any reason why the would load the same tables in a different order and is there anything I can do to align them without having to rewrite the script?

 

Thanks

Damien

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
rubenmarin

Hi Damien, I didn't found any reason and/or config value to keep old behaviour (wich doesn't means it doesn't exists, just that I haven't found it)

As you probably know Applymap returns the first match found, I always add the Order By clause to the mapping when is important that they load in a specific order, or even better keep the key field as unique values and only load the ones that should be returned.

 

View solution in original post

3 Replies
rubenmarin

Hi Damien, I didn't found any reason and/or config value to keep old behaviour (wich doesn't means it doesn't exists, just that I haven't found it)

As you probably know Applymap returns the first match found, I always add the Order By clause to the mapping when is important that they load in a specific order, or even better keep the key field as unique values and only load the ones that should be returned.

 

Brett_Bleess
Former Employee
Former Employee

Damien, did Ruben's post help, or are you still working on things?  I checked the Initial Release Notes for both 12.30 and 12.40, but did not see anything that looked applicable there.  I checked defect system too, but I could not really find anything definitive, there are some references to other changes in the product that impact ApplyMap, so I think Ruben is likely on the right track with things.  If you figured something out, please consider posting that and then mark that as the solution, and if you are still working on things, leave an update.

Regards,
Brett

To help users find verified answers, please do not forget to use the "Accept as Solution" button on any post(s) that helped you resolve your problem or question.
I now work a compressed schedule, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, so those will be the days I will reply to any follow-up posts.
damien_burns
Contributor II
Contributor II
Author

We didn't get to the bottom of the cause of the issue so we did just define some order by clauses to force the data to come through in a certain way

 

Thanks

Damien