Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
hi
how can i get a dynamic index field that assigns the current selection a number in asc order?
like this:
load A,
B,
rowno() as Index_Fix
from table.csv;
this would be the fix index. if i filter and get a subset of rows, the index_fix will display numbers assigned to the corresponding field in the table. Assume i have Num Rows = 100. If i filter in my application, my current selection accounts for,say 23 rows. I want to create a dynamic index, which assigns to the current selection a number in numerical order: 1,2,3,4,5, ... 23.
If i do a second filter of fields and i get as current selection 4 rows, then my dynamic index shall assign to the rows 1,2,3,4
how would this be possible?
thanks for any help
Felipe
Here is a sample of my latest suggested approach (FirstSortedValue() and show conditions).
See attached example for another option using one text box to display the texts.
Nice idea, I am a little fan of the valueloop() function.
A more traditional way to do the same might be (and also getting the sorting right):
=concat( aggr(rank(-index_fix) & ' - ' & text ,index_fix), chr(10))
thanks, this is really good, goes in line with the requirement, but it seems it is not practical for a big number of comments, it is working well, it will be very tedius with more than 2,000 comments.
Thanks! Yeah, that's a lot simpler. But index_fix is fixed. I thought the idea was to generate the index based on the number of selections and always starting from 1. Though the sorting then is hopeless of course
thanks, this is very practical, even though like as what the requirments owner wanted
easy to display 100s of comments
But index_fix is fixed. I thought the idea was to generate the index based on the number of selections and always starting from 1.
Yes, I think the rank() should take care of that. Attached your modified sample.
Actually, I don't see why you can't use a straight table with some formatting to make it look like a text box. See attached example (the yellow object on the left).
Ah, of course. Silly me.
perfect, the table is better, it is just that the req owner wanted each comment in a "comments diagram", which is an image (.png)
that was the reason
thanks again