Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Discussion board where members can learn more about Qlik Sense App Development and Usage.

Announcements

QlikWorld 2023, a live, in-person thrill ride. Save $300 before February 6: **REGISTER NOW!**

- Qlik Community
- :
- Forums
- :
- Analytics
- :
- App Development
- :
- Tricky calculations agregations

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

stephanegrimaud

Contributor II

2017-11-29
11:24 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Tricky calculations agregations

Hi all,

I try to implement a complex statistic calculation (trust interval) but I fail on an agregation problem :

Calculation of the **(ns/n2)*((Es(1-Es))+(nsSE2(ES)))** column should be done at **Groupe réadmission** level and should be able to be agregated on all others higher levels, like, here, **Service** or **Département**.

Calculation at **Groupe réadmission** level is ok (in green) and can be automatically agregated but it's impossible to get the right sum at **Service** level. Result is always wrong (in red).

Here is the formula of the **(ns/n2)*((Es(1-Es))+(nsSE2(ES)))** column :

If I do what is the most logic for me : **sum(aggr( <the_formula> ,[Groupe réadmission]))** then result is different but still wrong :

It's correct only if a single **Service** is selected :

I don't understand. I probably miss something. If someone has an idea, I would be happy to get it.

Many thanks in advance,

Stéphane

565 Views

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions

stephanegrimaud

Contributor II

2017-12-12
04:40 AM

Author

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Thank you Sunny.

Yes, you're right. Actually, I tried this but difficulty was that a part of the formula has to be summed over all the dimension.

Finally, I succeeded by adding the upper dimension on witch the sum has to be done in the context and by adding it also on the TOTAL option :

Unfortunatly, this formula can not be agregated on other dimension than the one which is specified so I have to multiply the expressions to have always the one to match where I want to use it. Here is the formula for the **Département** graph, if I want to make a graph per **Service** then I have to rewrite another expression with Service instead of **Département** but ok, that works like that.

Of course, if anyone has a better idea, I would be happy to know it.

Thanks in advance,

Stéphane

442 Views

4 Replies

sunny_talwar

MVP

2017-12-11
12:27 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

You need to use Sum(Aggr(YourExpression, YourDimensions)) to fix this... also check here

442 Views

stephanegrimaud

Contributor II

2017-12-12
04:40 AM

Author

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Thank you Sunny.

Yes, you're right. Actually, I tried this but difficulty was that a part of the formula has to be summed over all the dimension.

Finally, I succeeded by adding the upper dimension on witch the sum has to be done in the context and by adding it also on the TOTAL option :

Unfortunatly, this formula can not be agregated on other dimension than the one which is specified so I have to multiply the expressions to have always the one to match where I want to use it. Here is the formula for the **Département** graph, if I want to make a graph per **Service** then I have to rewrite another expression with Service instead of **Département** but ok, that works like that.

Of course, if anyone has a better idea, I would be happy to know it.

Thanks in advance,

Stéphane

443 Views

sunny_talwar

MVP

2017-12-12
08:53 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

I think what you have is probably the best you can do.

442 Views

stephanegrimaud

Contributor II

2017-12-12
09:26 AM

Author

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

I think so too. Thanks anyway Sunny .

Talk to you. Bye !

Stéphane