Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
What is the difference from creating additional roles to manage security for groups of users vs creating a custom property to manage a group of users? In the help file it suggests creating a custom property user type like Developer, Contributor, and Consumer. Is there any difference in functionality in doing this than creating additional roles?
It's a great question. I think the way to consider the difference in the scenario you highlight is:
With roles you can have one to many relationships between a user and roles (one user can have many roles).
With custom properties you have one to one relationships between a user and a property (one user can have one value from a given property).
So if your environment has a scenario where a user may be a developer in some areas and a consumer in others than a role based methodology using Security Rules is a better way to go.
Hope this helps.
Jeff G
It's a great question. I think the way to consider the difference in the scenario you highlight is:
With roles you can have one to many relationships between a user and roles (one user can have many roles).
With custom properties you have one to one relationships between a user and a property (one user can have one value from a given property).
So if your environment has a scenario where a user may be a developer in some areas and a consumer in others than a role based methodology using Security Rules is a better way to go.
Hope this helps.
Jeff G
Note that in the later versions of Qlik Sense (2.1 and up I think) there is a one-to-many relationship from resources (e.g. users) to custom properties.
Hi,
It would be great if you could confirm that there is a one to many relation available with custom properties in v2.1 if you have a server. Unable to find any document to verify this theoretically.
I have a case where a user can belong to more than one department (custom property) and the security rules are based on the @department property.
I am using 2.0.4 currently and thinking of a dirty solution to create combinations of departments as multiple value assignment is not supported.
Thanks
Karthik
Can't point you in the direction of documentation on this, but I can show you a screenshot of it on our QS2.2 server which hopefully shows it's possible. This is against a User with my "TestCP" custom property.
Before saving:
After saving:
Thanks Alex. Just what I was looking for.
Regards
Karthik
Hi Jeff
Have raised separate question here
Hi jog,
In the latest version of QS, we can assign multiple values to a Custom Properties. How do we now decide when to use Role and when to use Custom properties? Any guidance on this?
Regards,
Kashif