Skip to main content
Announcements
See what Drew Clarke has to say about the Qlik Talend Cloud launch! READ THE BLOG
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Suggestion about taxonomy of fields

Hello,

I'm starting to use QS and now I got about 15 tables to load .

Becouse of very hight number of fields to manage I'm wondering wich is the best way to code them.

When I go to search field for dimensions or misures .... it start to become a mess....;-)

Is it better to use a table prefix in order to understand the origin of field ?

i.e.

cust_cust_id

cust_name

cust_address and so on....

or

cust_id_cust

name_cust

address_cust

other hint are welcome

thanks

3 Replies
robert_mika
Master III
Master III

The first approach work for me.

Remember that Qualify function will do the job for you

Do you Qualify?- How to use QUALIFY statement

Not applicable
Author

Hi Mika,

thanks for suggestions...;-)

ogster1974
Partner - Master II
Partner - Master II

Another idea is to standard prefix some of your common data elements. Your keys with a % symbol and _ your flags is the suggestion i've seen and adopted for my data models to group those types of data elements together

Regards

Andy