Skip to main content
Announcements
Global Transformation Awards! Applications are now open. Submit Entry
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Anonymous
Not applicable

How to obfuscate (mask) dimension values dynamically

I have quite an interesting request from our customer. We have a dashboard around physicians data with dimensions like physician, practice name, office name etc. They ask to implement security model as:

1) all physicians and her/his staff will see ALL data, even for other physicians

2) BUT they would not see real names of other physicians / practices / offices so they will be obfuscated.

3) corporate management will have access to all data and they will see all real names

That way a physician (or her staff) can compare data with peers but won't see their real names.

E.g.

I am physician Dr. Smith. When I open dashboard, I see data in listboxes and charts like that:

Physician    Collections

Dr. Smith     $10,000

Provider 1      $8,000

Provider 2     $12,000


I am an office manager working for both Dr. Smith and Dr. Moore. When I open a dashboard, I see data in listboxes and charts like that:

Physician    Collections

Dr. Smith     $10,000

Dr. Moore       $8,000

Provider 2     $12,000


I don't believe Section access can be used here so I was thinking about mapping windows IDs to physician dimension (and this mapping can be stored in Excel file) and then they open a document, kick off a trigger to select and lock specific physicians - I tried this and it works pretty well.


The part I am still trying to figure out is what is the best way to mask data like that - my plan is to

1) have fields with real names and obfuscated names (e.g. Physician Name and Physician Name Masked). The masked one will be created using Autonumber function like 'Physician ' & Autonumber ([Physician Name])


2) use calculated dimensions everywhere in listboxes, charts etc. and put a condition to check if user is allowed to see data for a physician and then show real name or show masked one.


Is there a better way of doing this? I really hate to use calculated dims everywhere


11 Replies
Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

i wish i could give pints to both of you, but you have plenty already! so i accepted Sinan's answer. And he has a cooler avatar as well

Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

thanks Andrew, interesting approach but I do not think it will work with my data model. I guess I will just do calculated dimensions