Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi All,
Please find below data
| Vendor_Name | Item | Component |
| AFFYMETRIX INC | 301110-01 | 301110-01 |
| 301110-01 | 301110-01 | |
| AFFYMETRIX INC | 301130B | 301110-01 |
| BERLIN PACKAGING LLC. | 301130B | 301110-01 |
| Charter Medical | 301130B | 301110-01 |
| 301130B | 301110-01 | |
| 105585 | 301110-01 | |
| 301110 | 301110-01 |
In fact I was writing a condition like if(isnull(Vendor_Name), Item) but came to know that for eg 301130B
it should not show up as 301130B has other vendors.
The only output I should get is
105585, 301110 as they are not part of another Vendor
Attaching excel of the same
please note that the two expected may have multiple rows but for all of them Vendor Names should be null
if(count(total <Vendor_Name> Item) > 0, ...
if(count(total <Item> Vendor_Name) > 0, ...
May be this in set analysis
{<Item = {"=Len(Trim(Concat(DISTINCT Vendor_Name))) = 0"}>}
UPDATE: Assuming you want to show 105585 and 301110
Does this work when we have multipe rows for 105585 and 301110 Sunny
As long as each of the row has no Vendor_Name for 105585 and 301110, you will see both the items. In general, when a item (even if there are thousands of rows) doesn't have a Vendor_Name associated with it, it should work....
should even work without distinct or?
Let me give a try with my data
It would... but why complicate by adding multiple values of same vendor name... in fact this might work also (assuming Vendor_Name is null and not contain blank spaces)
{<Item = {"=Count(DISTINCT Vendor_Name) = 0"}>}
makes sense