Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Join us to spark ideas for how to put the latest capabilities into action. Register here!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
datanibbler
Champion
Champion

Data model issue - inconsistency - how bad is that?

Hi,

my issue is the following:

- This year (2014), some dpts have introduced new Excel_lists, among them the one on (the app of) which I'm currently working:
- I am and have been loading the data into QlikView as many tables although it all comes from just one Excel file, just to keep it clear.

  => In most cases, I could append the list from the 2014 file to the list from the 2013 file since the structure is the same.

<=> In the current instance, I can't do that because there are many more fields in the list for this than in the list for last year.

=> My question is this: Can I concatenate them still (forced concatenation)? That will generate a lot of NULL values I know.
    <=> On the other hand, it will make the whole thing a lot easier because I won't have to implement two redundant expressions
    - using different fields (from different tables) for 2013 than for 2014.

Can someone clarify this for me? What exactly are the consequences of this structural assymetry?

Thanks a lot!

Best regards,

DataNibbler

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
marcus_sommer

I think forced concatenation is the best way in this case - NULL didn't matter. I do it in a lot of cases.

- Marcus

View solution in original post

3 Replies
marcus_sommer

I think forced concatenation is the best way in this case - NULL didn't matter. I do it in a lot of cases.

- Marcus

datanibbler
Champion
Champion
Author

Hi Marcus,

yes, I am doing that and so far it seems to work. I just had to flexibilize a few of the expressions on the GUI to work based on a different set of fields, depending on the year the user has selected.

Let's see.

Thanks a lot!

Best regards,

DataNibbler