Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
 
					
				
		
Hi,
How do we dynamically load the data in qlikview.
I mean if i open the report it should be refreshed with the current data without the user doing the reload operation.
Please help.
Its urgent.
Thanks in advance.
 
					
				
		
If you use Qlikview server, then schedule reloads / partial reload along the day.
If you use Qlikview analyzer you need to create batch to reload them
Now if you want to reload applications using a macro in a web page , you need to use EDX, but I never done that in a document macro...
How do you plan to access your documents ?
Rgds,
Sébastien
 
					
				
		
 biester
		
			biester
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
			
		
		
			
					
		The plan as I understand it is:
When opening a QlikView-document or application (qvw) it should automatically be reloaded.
I know only of one way to achieve the desired: open it locally (not in server) and by an OnOpen - trigger reload it.
Rgds,
Joachim
 
					
				
		
 prieper
		
			prieper
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
			
		
		
			
					
		Think that one has to live with the fact, that the QV-data are always static at a certain point of time. You only may shorten the intervals, when an application is refreshed. If real online-data is required, think that QV is not the appropriate tool - then it will be direct ODBC and SQL as your favourite language.
Peter
 
					
				
		
Hi Joachim,
You can put a button on the sheet or whenever a sheet opens/activates(or however you want to fire the action), and add a little macro with > ActiveDocument.Reload.
Thanks
 
					
				
		
 biester
		
			biester
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
			
		
		
			
					
		Xena,
yes, you can, but the reload should take place (as I understand it) on opening a document and not on activating a sheet.
Using a button would not be an automatic reload. Besides, I'd not use a button with a macro if a can use Ctrl-R.
Rgds,
Joachim
 
					
				
		
You can add an Action on the OnOpen 'Document Event trigger'
 
					
				
		
 biester
		
			biester
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
			
		
		
			
					
		Correct; that's what I suggested in my first post to this thread.
 
					
				
		
Thank you very much.
