Hi,
I have a table like:
Case# | City |
---|---|
1 | London |
1 | New York |
1 | New Jersey |
2 | Miami |
2 | New York |
2 | Dublin |
3 | Mumbai |
4 | Havana |
When I select the city London, I can only see the top row as expected, but is there a way to display the other cities associated to case 1?
Basically, I need to show all cities that share a case with the selected city. So, if I select New York, I want to see all rows for Case 1 and 2, but none of the rows for case 3 and 4.
Any ideas?
You can do this in a straight table using set analysis in your expression
{<City, Case# = p(Case#)>}
You can do this in a straight table using set analysis in your expression
{<City, Case# = p(Case#)>}
Yes! Could you explain what that statement does? I've never seen it before.
It ignores selection in City field... so will disregard selection in London, but will look at all possible values of Case# based on selection in City field. So when you selected London, only possible value for Case#1, so the chart will display all cities (if city is your dimension) where Case# 1 is possible
Perfect. Thanks so much!
No problem my friend