Skip to main content
Woohoo! Qlik Community has won “Best in Class Community” in the 2024 Khoros Kudos awards!
Announcements
Nov. 20th, Qlik Insider - Lakehouses: Driving the Future of Data & AI - PICK A SESSION
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Ignore Field selection in set analysis where null values are associated

Below is the table where i am calculating the sum of Dim1 and trying to ignore the selection Filter and alll the values that are associated are nulls(-), how to ignore the filter selection when i am calculating the dim1 sum or count?

FilterDim1
Solicited
0
0.5
0.666666667
0.833333333
1
1.166666667
1.25
1.666666667
2
2.5
2.666666667
4
4.666666667
5
6.666666667
10
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Not applicable
Author

This is what solved my issues

AS i was using set analysis inside a aggr and sum. i did another set ignore condition on the sum as well

here what worked form me

Sum({<Filter=>}aggr(sum({<Filter=,field2=,field3=>}Dim1),Dim2))

View solution in original post

7 Replies
Not applicable
Author

I have tried

Sum(aggr(sum({<filter={'*'},field2=,field3=>}dim1),fieldA,FieldB))

Sum(aggr(sum({<filter={'*'}-{''},field2=,field3=>}dim1),fieldA,FieldB))

Sum(aggr(sum({-<filter={'*'}>*<field2=,field3=>}dim1),fieldA,FieldB))


not sure if  i am missing anything i just want to ignore the filter slections in the calculation.

Gysbert_Wassenaar

Maybe like this: sum({<[Filter Solicited]=,Dim1={'*'}>}Dim1)


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
ramoncova06
Partner - Specialist III
Partner - Specialist III

you can try with nullcount

=Sum({<dim1={"=nullcount(filter)=0"},field2=,field3=>}dim1)

here is  a post from HIC on how to handle nulls

NULL handling in QlikView

Not applicable
Author

Nope, @Gysbert Wassenaar

still doesn't work. The numbers does change with filter selection.

Not applicable
Author

It comes out to be value '0'

@RamonCova06

Not applicable
Author

Well i have another fields as well in the set analysis where some of there to be ignored and some to set the values and also the expression has aggr as well does with all these parameters the soultions provided may not be working but again im anticipating this might be the reason i guess.

Not applicable
Author

This is what solved my issues

AS i was using set analysis inside a aggr and sum. i did another set ignore condition on the sum as well

here what worked form me

Sum({<Filter=>}aggr(sum({<Filter=,field2=,field3=>}Dim1),Dim2))