Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Qlik Open Lakehouse is Now Generally Available! Discover the key highlights and partner resources here.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
aarshad67
Contributor II
Contributor II

Qlikview Script Load Very slow with Virtual server database

Hello there.

We are finding that when running a script data load using a SQL database sat on a virtual server, it runs very slow as opposed to running a script data load using a SQL database sat on a physical server.

For example :

  1. QlikView SQL data load (3m+ records) on physical server with database also sat on physical server : 15 mins 8 secs load time
  2. QlikView SQL data load (3m+ records) on virtual server but with database sat on physical server : 16 mins 34 secs load time
  3. QlikView SQL data load (3m+ records) on virtual server with database also sat on virtual server  : 1 hour 9 mins load time

Just as an additional test, I ran SQL extracts on both the physical and virtual database servers

  1. Physical Server : SQL Select ALL on 3m+ records table : 3 mins 12 seconds
  2. Virtual Server : SQL Select ALL on 3m+ records table : 3 mins


FYI we are running QlikView version 11.


So it does seem to point to Qlikview as opposed to any network/resource issue. Would you agree ?


Is data load performance much slower with virtual server database as opposed to physical server database ?


If so, is there a workaround ?


Thanks in advance.


regards


Abdullah.

1 Reply
petter
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

It's hard to give much advise without more data:

  • What is the memory and CPU configuration of all the different servers - virtual and physical?
  • What is the size of the data extracted?
  • How does the QlikView load script look like?

Virtual servers shouldn't affect performance in such a dramatic way as you experience unless the virtual server is significantly under-powered in respect to RAM and or CPU.

I wouldn't agree that the numbers suggest that you can rule out network/resource issue?