Qlikviews visible in accesspoint, but not the documents folder?

[stevelord]

Hi, we keep our Accesspoint qvws in the default root folder C:\ProgramData\QlikTech\Documents\

There are no mounted folders specified in qvmc.

There are eight Qvws, last refreshed a few months ago, that I and my colleagues and our boss can't see in the documents folder.  We're not sure if a predecessor hooked something in somehow, or how qlikview is pulling them in.  Everything I see in the various server and system settings are only pointing to the one server and the one documents folder.  We had other priorities for awhile, but I'm trying to clean house a bit and these files are annoying the tar out of me.

Any ideas on where or how to look for these mystery qlikviews?

[#2 · Accepted solution]

Good Afternoon

You have 8 (QlikView Web Server) or 8 (Documents .Qvw)?

If there aren´t mounted folders specified in QVMC. The documents (Qvw) is in C:\ProgramData\QlikTech\Documents\.

Or search documents (*.Qvw), but find folders in where is it?

And then mounted this folders in QVMC.

[stevelord]

they are 8 qvws we can see on accesspoint, but can't see in the C:\ProgramData\QlikTech\Documents\.folder and not finding elsewhere that we look.  There are no mounted folders.  I was hoping I was overlooking something somewhere in qvmc that would tell me where else it's getting files.  The tab showing the root and mounted folders only shows C:\ProgramData\QlikTech\Documents\. for the root folder and nothing under mounted folders.

[stevelord]

Nevermind, I found them and feel like a dork for not having dug into all the sub folders better.   I found them in various subfolders of one 'batch files' folder I had glossed over, not thinking to find qvws in a batch files folder.

After reading your post, the last line you wrote nagged at me, so I took a step back and just did a file search of the c drive for one of the qvws (duh!).  After five minutes it started coughing out file paths a couple layers below the qliktech documents folder..

Thanks again for the sanity check, and for fleshing out an answer to my question.  We geniuses over here just overlooked the easiest solution.