Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
QV Guru's
I've exhausted all of my resources trying to figure out this one. See below and attached .qvw. I'm using a calculated dimension in my pivot table to give me the Top 5 of QuantityA and bucket the rest in an "Others" row. This works fine, and when I do a simple RANK on QuantityA everything if fine.
But what if I wanted to include a RANK of QuantityB? I thought it would be simple enough, using set expression or the ALL operator on the RANK function I could IGNORE the calculated dimension and rank QuantityB numbers based on all Products. It seems as though I've tried every combination of set expressions and ALL operators and I still can't get it to work.
For example, the Product "Soundcard" should be ranked 12 not 6 (12th out of ALL Products not just the calculated dimension set).
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
We're off-piste with that question - 'ignoring but not ignoring' from within a table fundamentally goes against Qv's assocative logic so I can't see a better solution in the front-end that gets 'closer' than your existing calcuation.
Therefore I've come at it from a different angle and calculated the rank in the load script - file attached.
Hope that helps,
Matt - Visual Analytics Ltd
We're off-piste with that question - 'ignoring but not ignoring' from within a table fundamentally goes against Qv's assocative logic so I can't see a better solution in the front-end that gets 'closer' than your existing calcuation.
Therefore I've come at it from a different angle and calculated the rank in the load script - file attached.
Hope that helps,
Matt - Visual Analytics Ltd
Matt thanks a ton. So unfortunetely I can't do this in the object but like you said I can do it in the load script, which isn't as nice but it will work. Actually I'm a little happy that's it not possible in the chart object using set analysis or TOTAL operator as I spent so long trying to get it to work ths route I would feel dumb if there was an easy solution 🙂
Thanks again