Skip to main content
Announcements
See what Drew Clarke has to say about the Qlik Talend Cloud launch! READ THE BLOG
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
p_verkooijen
Partner - Specialist
Partner - Specialist

Using AGGR to calculate Like for like (LFL)

Untitled.png

I'm using AGGR conditions to determine if Sales Y vs LY is valid.

MAX diff in sales Y vs LY is 0,75 per Location/Week.

I only want to use the valid weeks for the locations.

I've managed to make AGGR for a Top level, but when a make a chart with a Category dimension the numbers are not what they should be.

Untitled2.png

This should be:

Knipsel.JPG

See attachment for example QVW.

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Gysbert_Wassenaar

See attached qvw. I'm not sure your calculations are correct. But that's for you to figure out. If you select a BenchmarkCategory the numbers change quite a bit. Compare the tables to the left and right of the listbox if when you select BenchmarkCategory values.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand

View solution in original post

2 Replies
Gysbert_Wassenaar

See attached qvw. I'm not sure your calculations are correct. But that's for you to figure out. If you select a BenchmarkCategory the numbers change quite a bit. Compare the tables to the left and right of the listbox if when you select BenchmarkCategory values.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
p_verkooijen
Partner - Specialist
Partner - Specialist
Author

Hi Gysbert,

Tried to implement the solution in the client dashboard, however as you mentioned a selection changes the numbers. Expecially with average calculations.

I've come up with a solution for this problem.

  • Add a field Location_Week in the facttable
  • Created a variable which used the likeforlike formula to represent all valid location_week combinations in a Set Analysis string format
  • Then use this variable in the SA of the formula like SUM({<Year={2013}, $(vValidLocationWeek)>} Sales)

See attached Solution.qvw

Thanks for your help on this.