Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Save $650 on Qlik Connect, Dec 1 - 7, our lowest price of the year. Register with code CYBERWEEK: Register
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Which of these load statements is faster?

The target of this script is to have a list of images indexed in qlikview to load in a chart:

for each File in filelist ('\\path\directory\*');

IMAGE_TABLE:
add load distinct
purgechar(purgechar(left('$(File)',6),'.-'),chr(39)) as INVN_SBS_DESCRIPTION1,
'$(File)' as INVN_SBS_IMAGE,
autonumber('$(File)') as AUTO_INDEX;
next File

store * from IMAGE_TABLE into IMAGE_TABLE.qvd;
drop table IMAGE_TABLE;


Has anybody noticed differences with using:


IMAGE_TABLE:
add load distinct
purgechar(purgechar(left(filename(),6),'.-'),chr(39)) as INVN_SBS_DESCRIPTION1,
'filename()' as INVN_SBS_IMAGE,
autonumber('filename()') as AUTO_INDEX
from \\path\directory\*;

store * from IMAGE_TABLE into IMAGE_TABLE.qvd;
drop table IMAGE_TABLE;


Thanks!!

P.S.: the directory I'm reading in has 35k files and growing, the second statement runs in 2-3 hours depending on the LAN saturation, the first one I'm testing now but I haven't noticed differences yet...

0 Replies