Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi,
in order to avoid field name conflicts I use a lot of 'store' sentences creating a lot of qvds.
At the end I have many useless qvds.
Is there a way to eliminate them at the end of the script?
Thanks
Concatenation is not a real problem - NoConcatenate prefix helps there. Concerning Exists() (and Peek, FieldIndex, LookUp), You are right, there might be problem if one wants to differentiate between tables ... then Your recommendation - QUALIFY comes to help
Hey, let us neat freaks have our fun. We're people too ¬¬
Hi everybody,
I do not like too much the qualify/unqulify option because it takes me a lot of time to control many names in memory even if they are different. I prefer get rid of them temporaly using 'store'/'drop'. Is true that using 'store'/'drop' the confusion goes from the script to the folder where I place the qvds because some of them are trash but others are usefull for other scripts. Maybe create a folder called 'trash' would be a good and simple idea.
Thank you.
And also you can use
Drop Tables TableName1.qvd,TableName2.qvd....TableNameN;
if remove only from model
Regards
Anand