Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Join us in Bucharest on Sept 18th for Qlik's AI Reality Tour! Register Now
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Anonymous
Not applicable

tSchemaComplianceCheck errorCode Not expected behaviour

Hi,
I have a simple job with :
tFileInputDelimited -->tSchemaComplianceCheck --reject--> tFileOutputDelimited
In the description of tSchemaComplianceCheck with can read that errCode is a summation of ALL errorcode :
2 for type disparency
4 for null or empty
8 for length and precision error
Now if i analyse my outputfile :
The two first lines, there is no problem. They match the rules above.
Errcode -- ErrMsg
8 -- MEINS:exceed max length
4 -- MEINS:empty or null
But when i got multiple error it start to have a weird behaviour :
Errcode -- ErrMsg
16 -- MATKL:empty or null;MEINS:empty or null
10 -- NTGEW:wrong type|invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision
8 -- VOLUM 0683p000009MAB6.pngrecision Non-matches
8 -- VOLUM:invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision
16 -- NTGEW:wrong type|invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision;VOLUM:invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision
The first line is already mind blowing since empty or null throw a 4 errorcode so it should be 8 (4+4). Since 16 is 4*4 at this point i was thinking that errorcode from different column was multiply.
The next line is ok, wrong type (2) + invalid length(8) give 10.
Two next lines are ok too for obvious reason.
But the last one is really annoying. The result is 16. There is 3 errors, wrong type and invalid length should give 10 like my previous line showed it, so with an other invalid precision it should end to 18 and if i apply my consideration about multiple column multiplying errocode is should be 10 * 8 = 80.
Finally i have two big problems : Two errors of 4 value gives 16, and a triple errors that should leads to 18 gives 16.
Do i am wrong somewhere ?
Labels (2)
3 Replies
Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Hi,
How did you set tSchemaComplianceCheck? Have you already check component reference TalendHelpCenter:tSchemaComplianceCheck?
Could you please elaborate your case with an example with input and expected output values?
Best regards
Sabrina
Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

I am using a schema for compliance check and treat empty as NULL.
Schema is kind of :
MATKL Not Nullable String Length 9
MEINS Not Nullable String Length 3
NTGEW Nullable BigDecimal Length 13(decimal 3)
VOLUM Nullable BigDecimal Length 13(decimal 3)
Input
line number | MATKL | MEINS | NTGEW | VOLUM
1 | TEST | TESTLENGTH| |
2 | TEST | | |
3 | | | 12 | 12
4 | TEST | TES | num12345678901 | |
5 | TEST | TES | | 123.1234 |
6 | TEST | TES | | 12345678901234 |
7 | TEST | TES | num12345678901 | 12345678901234 |
Following cimponent rules :
2 for type disparency
4 for null or empty
8 for length and precision error
my expected result is :
line number | error message | error code
1 | MEINS : max length | 8
2 | MEINS : null | 4
3 | MATKL : null ;MEINS : null | 8(4+4)
4 | NTGEW : wrong type + max length | 10 (2+8)
5 | VOLUM : max precision | 8
6 | VOLUM max length | 8
7 | NTGEW : wrong type + max length ; VOLUM max length | 18 ( 2+ 8 + 😎
Actual result :
line number | error message | error code
1 | MEINS:exceed max length | 8
2 | MEINS:empty or null | 4
3 | MATKL:empty or null;MEINS:empty or null | 16
4 | NTGEW:wrong type|invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision | 10
5 | VOLUM 0683p000009MAB6.pngrecision Non-matches | 8
6 | VOLUM:invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision | 8
7 | NTGEW:wrong type|invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision;VOLUM:invalid Length setting is unsuitable for Precision | 16
So error message are perfects but error code are not the expected one taking in consideration the rules described by the component itself.
Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Hi BREUILj
It looks like there is a bug, i tested it with v5.4.1 and got the same problem. Can you please report jira issue under Talend DI project in our bugtracker.
https://jira.talendforge.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa
Thanks!
Shong