
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sum for the Latest Month across the Years
Hello
Goal:
- Create a Master Measure for Total Number of Employees to be used against any dimension
- Total Number of Employees is a cumulative value so it is not a direct Sum, ie: it should be the Sum of Employees found in the Latest Month.
Examples below on data and output chart needed.
Currently i tried the below Set Expression:
SUM ({$< [Year Month]={$(=MAX([Year Month]))} >} [Number of Employees])
However, when i place this measure in a bar chart grouped by the Year, only the Latest Year will get a value while the rest will be ZERO.
Ex: if Latest Month in the data is = 2020-08, but knowing i have months in the previous years
Fiscal Year | Total Employee |
2019 | 0 |
2020 | 10 |
Example of Data Present:
Calendar:
Date | Year | Fiscal Year | Year Month |
2019-08-01 | 2019 | 2019 | 2019-08 |
2019-09-01 | 2019 | 2019 | 2019-09 |
2019-10-01 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019-10 |
Fact Table:
DateRegionHead Count
Date | Region | Number of Employees |
2019-08-01 | A | 1 |
2019-08-01 | B | 1 |
2019-09-01 | A | 2 |
2019-09-01 | B | 2 |
2019-09-01 | C | 2 |
2019-10-01 | A | 3 |
2019-10-01 | B | 3 |
2019-10-01 | C | 3 |
Target Measure/Chart:
Table Chart that will show this:
Fiscal Year | Total Employee | Logic |
2019 | 6 | Sum of the Regions found in Month 2019-09 ; the last month of the Fiscal Year 2019 |
2020 | 9 | Sum of the Regions found in Month 2019-10 ; the last month of the Fiscal Year 2020 |
- « Previous Replies
- Next Replies »


- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In your set expression the value of Max is calculated only once

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes true, if there is a way to make it recalculate for every row or cell of the chart would resolve my issue i believe, but I do not know if that is possible with Qlik
If i take same expression and place it as a measure, it returns the correct value per Quarter or Year, but when placed in a set expression yes it only returns the global max outside context of the chart


- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please remind me which tabs in the dashboard I should be looking at and what result do you expect exactly

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes Sorry
So sheet named: My new sheet
The bottom chart holds the calculation i was mentioning.
Now there if i only have Year --> Month OR Quarter --> Month
The calculation done is fine except for the Total when i have the Quarter expanded, it just shows ZEROs.
Main goal for these is to be able to replace the current Row dimension (EntityBase Level) with anything else and have calculation still work, where only the latest month value is being shown per Column grouping.


- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Try this
if
(
Dimensionality() = 1
,sum(SignedData) // Month Level
,FirstSortedValue(aggr(sum(SignedData), [Year Month Number] ),-aggr(only([Year Month Number]) , [Year Month Number]))
)

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I modified the measure just to handle having Year --> Quarter --> Month and made it like this
if
(
Dimensionality() = 2
,sum(SignedData) // Month Level
,FirstSortedValue(aggr(sum(SignedData), [Year Month Number] ),-aggr(only([Year Month Number]) , [Year Month Number])) // Year and Quarter Level
)
So this works if i have only one value in the Rows selected, so example if i select Entity Base Level MASIA i get the following which is correct:
But if i don't have any selections i get this:


- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In that case dimensionality is still 1 as it's linked to the rows
if you wanted to explore column dimensionality you need to use secondarydimensionality but I don't believe you need it in your case

- « Previous Replies
- Next Replies »