Skip to main content
Announcements
Accelerate Your Success: Fuel your data and AI journey with the right services, delivered by our experts. Learn More
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Aarya_Kankipati
Contributor III
Contributor III

Second Top most for a varaible

Second MOST Top 3 values in field
 
Year_Week Product
202403 29
202402 56
202401 26
202352 58
202351 79
202350 47
202349 44
.. ..
.. ..
202201 39

 

I have a year week field as above; I created a variable (V_YW) equal to field (YW).

If I want to select 202402, it should give 202401, 202352, 202351 like past 3 weeks.

 

I tried this but it taking 202401, 202400, 202399
sum ({$ <YW={">=$(=max(YW)-3)"}>} product)

 

this it to get 202352, but its giving 202400

sum ({ <YW={'$(=max((V_YW)-2))'}>} product)

2 Solutions

Accepted Solutions
marcus_sommer

You need a continuous week-field for this kind of task, for example created per autonumber(YearWeek) within the master-calendar or a field with a different math to yours - maybe done within a dual() like:

dual(Year * 100 + Week, Year * 52 + Week) as YearWeek

View solution in original post

marcus_sommer

With a dual-value like above suggested you could use your first approach, like:

sum ({$ <YW={">=$(=max(YW)-3)"}>} product)

and directly selecting the YW field.

To get it with variables would need more efforts because not only the field must follow the continuous logic else also the variable. But a variable doesn't provide a dual() feature which means the variable-value needs to be queried and depending of a possible year-switch transformed in different branches. Surely possible but it's not an elegant way.

Therefore field-selections would be easier whereby IMO it isn't too hard for an user to select 3 weeks (the field-sorting might be set to descending) or to apply a search like: >=202352. It's simple and fast and not more work as setting a variable-value.

View solution in original post

4 Replies
MK_QSL
MVP
MVP

Create one more field like below.

 

DATA:
Load
Year_Week
    ,Product
    ,MakeWeekDate(Left(Year_Week,4), Right(Year_Week,2)) as Date
Inline
[
    Year_Week, Product
    202403, 29
    202402, 56
    202401, 26
    202353, 100
    202352, 58
    202351, 79
    202350, 47
    202349, 44
    202348, 50
    202347, 40
    202346, 45
];
 
and use expression as below
SUM({<Year_Week, Date = {">=$(=Date(Max(Date)-21))<$(=Date(Max(Date)))"}>}Product)
marcus_sommer

You need a continuous week-field for this kind of task, for example created per autonumber(YearWeek) within the master-calendar or a field with a different math to yours - maybe done within a dual() like:

dual(Year * 100 + Week, Year * 52 + Week) as YearWeek

Aarya_Kankipati
Contributor III
Contributor III
Author

I have the yearweek column in load editor as a field which runs and updates everyday; I also created a variable using that field. 

Name of Variable             Definition of Variable
V_YW                                             YW

I am looking for an expression to select past 3 weeks. (If I select this week, I need to get select the past 3 weeks, sum of products)

marcus_sommer

With a dual-value like above suggested you could use your first approach, like:

sum ({$ <YW={">=$(=max(YW)-3)"}>} product)

and directly selecting the YW field.

To get it with variables would need more efforts because not only the field must follow the continuous logic else also the variable. But a variable doesn't provide a dual() feature which means the variable-value needs to be queried and depending of a possible year-switch transformed in different branches. Surely possible but it's not an elegant way.

Therefore field-selections would be easier whereby IMO it isn't too hard for an user to select 3 weeks (the field-sorting might be set to descending) or to apply a search like: >=202352. It's simple and fast and not more work as setting a variable-value.