Skip to main content
Announcements
Join us at Qlik Connect for 3 magical days of learning, networking,and inspiration! REGISTER TODAY and save!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
MikeJones
Creator
Creator

Sum If

Hi, the first 5 columns are a snapshot of my data table in Excel.  Coln titled MExp shows the value of MetersInstalled should it be above MetersExp.

Jobid Date MetersExp MetersInstalled Client MExp
1 02/01/2023 2 1 YYYY 2
2 22/01/2023 0 2 XXXX 2
3 11/02/2023 1 1 YYYY 1
4 03/03/2023 0 1 YYYY 1
5 23/03/2023 2 1 XXXX 2
6 12/04/2023 0 1 YYYY 1
7 02/05/2023 0 2 XXXX 2

 

What I wish to do, is sum by client the number of meters expected using MExp - I don't wish to create a new variable in my data variable table.  I have been trying different Set Analysis expressions and now I'm hitting my head against a wall.

 

Labels (3)
2 Solutions

Accepted Solutions
MikeJones
Creator
Creator
Author

Thanks Aytacbas for your idea.

What I need to do is

sum(if(MetersInstalled>MetersExp,MetersInstalled,MetersExp), however I'm uncertain how to do this in set analysis.

View solution in original post

Cascader
Creator
Creator

you can ease a bit by using a calculated column

load

jobid,

date,

...,

if(MetersInstalled>MetersExp,MetersInstalled,MetersExp) as x

from qvd;

then use the set analysis the way you like.

View solution in original post

3 Replies
aytacbas
Contributor III
Contributor III

Hi Mike,

 

you can use aggregation function like this

Aggr({SetExpression}[DISTINCT] [NODISTINCT ] expr, StructuredParameter{, StructuredParameter})

 

The result you expect are as follows

 

aytacbas_0-1695059125692.png

 

MikeJones
Creator
Creator
Author

Thanks Aytacbas for your idea.

What I need to do is

sum(if(MetersInstalled>MetersExp,MetersInstalled,MetersExp), however I'm uncertain how to do this in set analysis.

Cascader
Creator
Creator

you can ease a bit by using a calculated column

load

jobid,

date,

...,

if(MetersInstalled>MetersExp,MetersInstalled,MetersExp) as x

from qvd;

then use the set analysis the way you like.