Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
I have data file like this (only an example):
Uniq_ID | Price1 | Price2 | weight |
1 | 10 | 20 | 1,50 |
1 | 15 | 30 | 1,50 |
1 | 25 | 50 | 1,50 |
2 | 10 | 10 | 1,25 |
2 | 40 | 40 | 1,25 |
3 | 10 | 60 | 2,50 |
With one condition (variable ’ vMaxPrisKvm’ set with a slider) I can use this expression getting my desired result:
Sum({<[Price1] = {">=$(vPrice1)"}>}Aggr(Only([weight]), Uniq_ID))
If I set my slider to 30 the result will be ’1.25’ as Uniq-ID 2 is the only one with a Price1-value bigger than 30.
But now I like to sum distinct with two variables (Price1 and Price2).
If I set my first slider (Price1) to 30 and a second slider (Price2) to 55 the result should be 3.75 (sum of weight for Uniq_ID 2 and 3).
I have tried something like:
Sum({ <[Price1] = {">=$(vPrice1)"}> or <[Price2] = {">=$(vPrice2)"}>}Aggr(Only([weight]), Uniq_ID))
}Aggr(Only([weight]), Uniq_ID))
But the syntax using 'or' isn’t correct.
How do I do that?
Not sure about the rest of the equation, but in order to perform an "or" in set analysis, you need to use a "+" between the two sets <. . . >+<. . . >, like this.
Sum({<[Price1] = {">=$(vPrice1)"}>+<[Price2] = {">=$(vPrice2)"}>} Aggr(Only([weight]), Uniq_ID))
The data that you provide looks a little off, in terms of number of columns. If you can put it in a Load Inline statement, it would make it easier to help.
Not sure about the rest of the equation, but in order to perform an "or" in set analysis, you need to use a "+" between the two sets <. . . >+<. . . >, like this.
Sum({<[Price1] = {">=$(vPrice1)"}>+<[Price2] = {">=$(vPrice2)"}>} Aggr(Only([weight]), Uniq_ID))
The data that you provide looks a little off, in terms of number of columns. If you can put it in a Load Inline statement, it would make it easier to help.
Thanks a lot Gary - exactly what I was looking for.