Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hello,
After upgrading our Qlikview from the version 11.20 to the 12.20, I have noticed that a qvw is taking more than it used to. I always took in average 2 hours to complete, but now it is taking up to 4 hours. The qvw in question is exactly the same and does noting too fancy. In sum it reads data from a QVD to a table, two left joins are done to that table and then the data is stored into a new QVD. After, this new QVD is read and two new tables are created: one for value metrics and other for volume metrics. These two tables consist of basically a lot of crosstables that are joined together. In the end each table is stored into a QVD, being the result of the whole execution three QVD. Also it is worth noting that I am executing the file on both servers through the Qlikview Desktop, there is no Publisher involved.
Best regards,
Andre Braga
Qlikview 11.20 SO Specs:
Item Value
OS Name Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
Other OS Description Not Available
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Manufacturer HP
System Model ProLiant DL360p Gen8
System Type x64-based PC
Processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz, 3000 Mhz, 10 Core(s), 20 Logical Processor(s)
Processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz, 3000 Mhz, 10 Core(s), 20 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS Version/Date HP P71, 01-07-2015
SMBIOS Version 2.8
Windows Directory C:\Windows
System Directory C:\Windows\system32
Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume1
Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "6.1.7601.17514"
User Name Not Available
Time Zone GMT Standard Time
Installed Physical Memory (RAM) 192 GB
Total Physical Memory 192 GB
Available Physical Memory 181 GB
Total Virtual Memory 287 GB
Available Virtual Memory 273 GB
Page File Space 94,8 GB
Page File C:\pagefile.sys
Qlikview 12.20 SO Specs:
Item Value
OS Name Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
Version 6.3.9600 Build 9600
Other OS Description Not Available
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Manufacturer VMware, Inc.
System Model VMware Virtual Platform
System Type x64-based PC
System SKU
Processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz, 3196 Mhz, 16 Core(s), 16 Logical Processor(s)
Processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz, 3196 Mhz, 16 Core(s), 16 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS Version/Date Phoenix Technologies LTD 6.00, 21/09/2015
SMBIOS Version 2.4
Embedded Controller Version 0.00
BIOS Mode Legacy
BaseBoard Manufacturer Intel Corporation
BaseBoard Model Not Available
BaseBoard Name Base Board
Platform Role Desktop
Secure Boot State Unsupported
PCR7 Configuration Not Available
Windows Directory C:\Windows
System Directory C:\Windows\system32
Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume1
Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "6.3.9600.17196"
User Name Not Available
Time Zone GMT Standard Time
Installed Physical Memory (RAM) 192 GB
Total Physical Memory 192 GB
Available Physical Memory 182 GB
Total Virtual Memory 241 GB
Available Virtual Memory 230 GB
Page File Space 48,9 GB
Page File C:\pagefile.sys
Did you a look into the document-logs if the number of records are both the same and to find out if (nearly) all loadings are slower or if certain loadings are increasing in load-times?
- Marcus
In fact the reload from QV12 has less number of records since it is using data from a test machine, when compared to QV11 which uses data from production. I can't say all loadings are slower for some reason this one is. Don't know why.
Test below
Reload your application in QV12 in test server check task manager, Is it reaching to 100 % CPU utiliazation.
Similarly check in QV11 current production server.
If there any big change in task manger?? Post your observations..
Regards
Do I understand it right that all loadings are quite ok. but a particular one is significantely slower? Then it might useful to examine this load more closely maybe also by separating within a test-application to find any hint for the why.
Further less data could also lead to wrong loadings therefore I would also copy the source from the production and repeat the testing. Also keep in mind that the different environments could impact the results and not only by RAM + CPU (which seems more potent as in the production) but also by network and storage speed especially if this are not physical machines else VM's.
- Marcus
It appears your V11 machine is physical and the V12 machine is virtual. This is an apples-to-oranges comparison that is not valid without some serious setup and examination.
-Rob
If you have a valid Qlik support account check the knowledgebase for the following article
Opening documents in QlikView Desktop 12 and later uses more resources while the document is loaded. The consumption goes back to normal when the document is done loading.
This KB does explicitly mentions QV Desktop but I think the same applies to QV Publisher. QV12 transposes rows in a document to columns in memory, so during the load it needs more resources than QV11. Once the loading is complete the resources can return back to normal.