Skip to main content
Woohoo! Qlik Community has won “Best in Class Community” in the 2024 Khoros Kudos awards!
Announcements
Nov. 20th, Qlik Insider - Lakehouses: Driving the Future of Data & AI - PICK A SESSION
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cdss-developer
Contributor III
Contributor III

Critical or toxic function combinations

Hi, I hope someone can help me here.


Critical or Toxic function combinations

I have a table with function (codes) per user that looks like this:

User

Function

Jim

AA169

Jim

GB123

Jim

GB546

Jack

AA169

Jack

AA180

Jack

AA171

Jack

TC654

Jason

AT335

Jason

AT336

Sarah

AA169

Sarah

AA170

Joey

AA170

Joey

TC111

Joey

TC113

Joey

TC555

Richard

AZ456

I also have a table (Excel) with critical or ‘toxic’ (functioncode) combinations that are not allowed or critical and that I want to identify to look at.

ID

Comb1

Comb2

Comb3

Comb4

Comb5

Comb6

Comb7

Comb8

Comb9

Comb10

1

GB123

GB546

2

AA170

3

AA170

TC555

4

QC456

QC457

QC458

DF458

(A combination of functioncodes can be toxic/ critical, but also a single code as you can see by ID2)

I would like to get a table that looks like this:

User

Toxic

ToxicID

ToxicHIT

ToxicCode(s)

Jim

Yes

1

GB123

GB123, GB546

Jim

Yes

1

GB546

GB123, GB546

Jack

No

Jason

No

Sarah

Yes

2

AA170

AA170

Joey

Yes

3

AA170

AA170, TC555

Joey

Yes

3

TC555

AA170, TC555

Richard

No

I would be greatly helped if someone could solve this for me.

Kind regards,

Eelco

27 Replies
Peter_Cammaert
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

Indeed.

On-line converters usually limit input values to something like 9223372036854775807 which is the largest positive value in a 64-bit signed integer (first 63 bits set). I guess that's the maximum for QlikView too, before it starts converting bitmasks to floats.

It will work in Python, but that won't help us here.

Peter_Cammaert
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

If we can trust the num() function to go all the way, the situation is even more dramatic. Bit49 (starting from 0) is the last one that can be set, according to this screenshot:

MaxBitmaskSize.jpg

But that could be because num() probably has limits of its own....

Gysbert_Wassenaar

Another attempt using a loop over the toxic combinations. This should work fine I reckon. If you have an authorization matrix with no-go combinations of 64 functions or more there's a good chance you're doing something very wrong.

SET NullInterpret='';


Combinations:

CrossTable(CombId, Function)

LOAD * INLINE [

ID, Comb1, Comb2, Comb3, Comb4, Comb5, Comb6, Comb7, Comb8, Comb9, Comb10

1, GB123, GB546

2, AA170

3, AA170, TC555

4, QC456, QC457, QC458, DF458

];


Users:

LOAD * INLINE [

User, Function

Jim, AA169

Jim, GB123

Jim, GB546

Jack, AA169

Jack, AA180

Jack, AA171

Jack, TC654

Jason, AT335

Jason, AT336

Sarah, AA169

Sarah, AA170

Joey, AA170

Joey, TC111

Joey, TC113

Joey, TC555

Richard, AZ456

];


ToxicResults:

LOAD '' as User AutoGenerate 0;


For i = 1 To FieldValueCount('ID')


tmpToxicCombination:

LOAD

      ID,

      Function as Function_Lookup

RESIDENT

      Combinations

WHERE

      ID = FieldValue('ID', $(i))

      ;

mapFunction2BitValues:

MAPPING LOAD

      FieldValue('Function',RecNo()) as Function_Lookup,

      pow(2,RecNo()) as FunctionBitValue

AutoGenerate

      FieldValueCount('Function')

      ;

tmpBitMasks:

LOAD

      User,

      sum(ApplyMap('mapFunction2BitValues',Function)) as UserFunctionBitmask

RESIDENT

      Users

WHERE

      Exists(Function_Lookup,Function)

GROUP BY

      User

      ;     

JOIN  (tmpBitMasks)

LOAD

      ID,

      concat(Function_Lookup,',', Function_Lookup) as ToxicFunctionList,

      sum(ApplyMap('mapFunction2BitValues',Function_Lookup)) as ToxicBitmask

RESIDENT

      tmpToxicCombination

GROUP BY

      ID

      ;

CONCATENATE (ToxicResults)

LOAD

      User,

      ToxicID,

      ToxicFunctionList

WHERE

      MatchResult=0

      ;

LOAD

      User,

      ID as ToxicID,

      ToxicFunctionList,

      UserFunctionBitmask bitand ToxicBitmask - ToxicBitmask as MatchResult

RESIDENT

      tmpBitMasks

      ;

DROP TABLES tmpToxicCombination, tmpBitMasks;

Next


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
cdss-developer
Contributor III
Contributor III
Author

Yes, this seems to work! 

Works in case for the combinations. When there is only one value, then not yet it seems. I will look forward to it tomorrow.

Thank you very much for all your help today !!

Gysbert_Wassenaar

With your example data it works with single values too. See Sarah in the attached example.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
cdss-developer
Contributor III
Contributor III
Author

Yes, you're right, it works

Perfect!

Thank you gwassenaar and pcammaert so much!

MarcoWedel

Hi,

although your thread already is answered I want to propose another solution:

QlikCommunity_Thread_309605_Pic1.JPG

tabUserFunct:

LOAD User,

    Concat('|'&Function&'|') as UserFunct

FROM [https://community.qlik.com/thread/309605] (html, codepage is 1252, embedded labels, table is @1)

Group By User;

tabToxComb:

CrossTable (CombNo, Function)

LOAD * FROM [https://community.qlik.com/thread/309605] (html, codepage is 1252, embedded labels, table is @2);

mapToxCombMsk:

Mapping

LOAD ID,

    '*'&Concat('|'&Function&'|','*')&'*' as ToxCombMsk

Resident tabToxComb

Where Len(Trim(Function))

Group By ID;

FOR Each vID in FieldValueList('ID')

   tabUserTox:

   LOAD *,

       SubField([ToxicCode(s)],', ') as ToxicHIT;

   LOAD User as UserTox,

       'Yes' as Toxic,

       '$(vID)' as ToxicID,

       TextBetween(Replace(ApplyMap('mapToxCombMsk','$(vID)'),'|*|',', '),'*|','|*') as [ToxicCode(s)]

   Resident tabUserFunct

   Where UserFunct like ApplyMap('mapToxCombMsk','$(vID)');

NEXT

Concatenate(tabUserTox)

LOAD User as UserTox,

    'No' as Toxic

Resident tabUserFunct

Where not Exists (UserTox, User);

DROP Tables tabToxComb, tabUserFunct;

RENAME Field UserTox to User;

hope this helps

regards

Marco

cdss-developer
Contributor III
Contributor III
Author

Thanks Marco,

Nice solution!