Skip to main content
Woohoo! Qlik Community has won “Best in Class Community” in the 2024 Khoros Kudos awards!
Announcements
Nov. 20th, Qlik Insider - Lakehouses: Driving the Future of Data & AI - PICK A SESSION
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
jlongoria
Creator
Creator

Difference in Totals between Straight Table and Pivot Table

The attached qvw has a simple in inline table (see load script below). I first created the straight table then copied it and changed the copy to a pivot table. Why does the pivot table not show the totals correctly?

Load script:

LOAD * INLINE [

    F1, F2

    type1, subtype1

    type2, subtype1

    type3, subtype1

    type4, subtype1

    type1, subtype2

    type2, subtype2

    type3, subtype2

    type4, subtype2

    type1, subtype3

    type2, subtype3

    type4, subtype3

];

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Gysbert_Wassenaar

Because the pivot table does not have a Total Mode you can set to Sum of Rows. Try sum({<F2 ={ 'subtype2'} >}1) or maybe sum(aggr(if(F2 = 'subtype2', 1, 0),F1,F2)). Not sure if you care about showing the zero values.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand

View solution in original post

5 Replies
Gysbert_Wassenaar

Because the pivot table does not have a Total Mode you can set to Sum of Rows. Try sum({<F2 ={ 'subtype2'} >}1) or maybe sum(aggr(if(F2 = 'subtype2', 1, 0),F1,F2)). Not sure if you care about showing the zero values.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
buzzy996
Master II
Master II

ur expression creating the problem,u set for dimension subtype2=1 else for all the dimension 0,so in ut pivot table it will shows only for subtype2=1 else 0,pivot will calculates the result based on multiple dimensions. 

jlongoria
Creator
Creator
Author

Yes, I want to show the 0 values.

Gysbert_Wassenaar

Then use the second expression with the aggr.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
jlongoria
Creator
Creator
Author

I forgot I posted this. I really didn't know what I was doing.

With much more QlikView experience now I wouldn't do what I posted. In any case, thank you for the reply. Both of these work. While the Aggr() works as well, it is not necessary given the simple expression.

sum(if(F2 = 'subtype2', 1, 0))

and

sum({<F2 ={ 'subtype2'} >}1)  // uses set analysis (better than "if")