Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi guys,
i've this VBS code:
sub selectWeight
weight = ActiveDocument.Variables("vPeso").getcontent.string
x = CDbl(weight)
if x > 80 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Oltre gli 80 Q.li"
else if x > 60 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 80 Q.li"
else if x > 50 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 60 Q.li"
else if x > 40 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 50 Q.li"
else if x > 30 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 40 Q.li"
else if x > 25 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 30 Q.li"
else if x > 20 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 25 Q.li"
else if x > 15 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 20 Q.li"
else if x > 10 then
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 15 Q.li"
else
ActiveDocument.Fields("CATEGORIE PESO").Select "Fino a 10 Q.li"
end if
end if
end if
end if
end if
end if
end if
end if
end if
end sub
is possible to translate in QlikView code?
Thank you
Sorry but maybe I didn't explain myself well.
As result I want only one row for each ID, and this row depends on the comparison between ROUND and TYPE.
For example:
weight = 12,25
suppose:
ROUND_AA = 11
ROUND_AB = 13
ROUND_AC = 15
etc
the result should be:
ID TYPE PRICE ROUND TOTAL
AA less than 12 ... 11 ..... because ROUND_AA < 12
AB less than 14 .... 13 .... because ROUND_AB < 14
AC less than 16 ... 15 .... because ROUND_AC < 15
etc
I hope I explained it well
I don't understand the logic - why should Type be different for each ID (and if it should be rather an expression then a dimension or for each ID an own Type field) your ROUND_AA/AB/AC is not really a rounding to the weight of 12,25 - therefore what is the logic behind them and what is the aim?
- Marcus
Ok, maybe this example is clearer.
I would the lowest total, for every Seller.
For example:
for seller 2 the best choice could be type 2 A
but at the same time the best choice for seller 1 could be type 3 M
so the result should be
Seller 1 - type 3 - M - etc...
Seller 2 - type 2 - A - etc...
Seller 3 - etc...
this is only an example, the real app have more variables than this, and the total could be different every time.
I have a list of offers from many seller and I have choice the best for every one.
But the type could be different because every seller use different algorithm to categorize the product.
So I create a general system of classification that I can use, but however type could be different.
Now I don't know if pivot table is the best choice, but I need to show the information within a table and I have at the same time dimensions and expression.
At the end I want show only the best choice, not the other possibile choice.
I'm new in qlik, maybe there is another possibility to do this.
The aim is to generate a kind of dynamic pricing depending on various parameters, right? I think this a quite complicated task and you will need to combine a matrix of the fixed parameter (within one or several tables) and some nested queries on the flexible parameter (variables) for it. In your simplified example you used a few fixed values within the if-loops but this won't be work / be practically in a more complex case - therefore the table-matrix and for the expressions I suggest to use the pick(match()) - like in my example above.
Further I think you need two types of output-table - one with a result for each parameter-combination and one with a selected view on your wished best-case. But this best-case will be result of an expression and this couldn't be directly selected - this meant you need to compare the different results and find their max-value and to return NULL for all others and the NULL then could be hide and would therefore work like a selection.
That's now not a concrete solution (the task is too complex to develop one here) but that's the way I would start such a task and I would go it step by step untill I could define all requirements clearly and had concrete ideas how it could be designed - then I would start at beginning again.
- Marcus
Thanks for your answer.
I had this idea, I can create two table, the fist with all information
for example:
TALBE 1
seller1 - type1 - M - etc...
seller1 - type1 - A - etc...
seller1 - type2 - M - etc...
seller1 - type2 - A - etc...
seller2 - type1 - M - etc...
seller2 - type1 - A - etc...
seller2 - type2 - M - etc...
seller2 - type2 - A - etc...
seller3 - type1 - M - etc...
seller3 - type1 - A - etc...
seller3 - type2 - M - etc...
seller3 - type2 - A - etc...
etc...
now I read this table and I'll compose the second table with row from the first table
for example:
seller1 - type1 - A - etc...
seller2 - type2 - M - etc...
seller3 - type1 - M - etc...
etc...
can I do this?
I think the direction is right. At first the big matrix (as a kind of dimension table), the second step matched the fact-table with the dimension table and the third step will be the flexible calculations (on these fields and your variables) within the gui.
- Marcus