Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Join us to spark ideas for how to put the latest capabilities into action. Register here!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
michael_emram
Contributor
Contributor

How can I show value for non related dimension

Hi !

I have a not related value (Std Cost) to one of my dimension (PO Number), from different table as you can see in the straight table below

Capture2.PNG

Then, when I create a pivot table this is the result I get:

If I collapse on part, the calculation is ok, but if I open to PO Number, my Std Cost (good value) appears only for the first line, and I want it to duplicate the value of the Std Cost on the part level.

Capture.PNG

Currently, this is the set analysis calculation for the Std cost:

MAX(AGGR([Std Cost ($)],[Part Num],[Sort Fiscal])

How to see the same standart cost for both of the lines please ?

Thank you !

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
sunny_talwar

Can you try this:

Aggr(NODISTINCT [Std Cost ($)], [Part Num], [Sort Fiscal])

View solution in original post

6 Replies
sunny_talwar

Try this:

Max(TOTAL <[Part Num]> Aggr([Std Cost ($)], [Part Num], [Sort Fiscal])

adamdavi3s
Master
Master

Please see the attached example, i've been lazy with my fieldnames sorry but the forumla:

=max(total <partnum> aggr(max(stdcost),partnum,sortfiscal ))

should work

michael_emram
Contributor
Contributor
Author

Hi,

Thank you both, but in the screenshot I selected only one Part, but by applying your formula I get the same number for all my Parts.

In fact, I need one Std Cost for each Part and each Sort Fiscal (Year-Month)

Do you have any idea ?

Thank you

adamdavi3s
Master
Master

I tweaked mine slightly:

=max(total <partnum,sortfiscal> aggr(max(stdcost),partnum,sortfiscal ))

This seems to work in the attached example....

sunny_talwar

Can you try this:

Aggr(NODISTINCT [Std Cost ($)], [Part Num], [Sort Fiscal])

michael_emram
Contributor
Contributor
Author

Yes in fact that's work, thank you but this is only work with the specific field Part Num, and I have a lot of others field in the chart (like Part Description, Main Family ...) and when I replace this, it give me back the highest of all data (1 value for all)

That is why I used AGGR, to say him the lowest level, and here, it seens to be very specific and only to Part Num

Do you have an idea ?