Skip to main content
Announcements
NEW: Seamless Public Data Sharing with Qlik's New Anonymous Access Capability: TELL ME MORE!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
noman212
Creator III
Creator III

Optimization Technique

Dear Community,

Please find below the scenario i am currently facing in Qlikview. We have 2 Billion rows showing sales data.

I have to uniquely identify the shopcode irrespective of dimensions selected. i am using below expression to evaluate the result but dashboard is taking too much time. KIndly suggest the optimiation technique to imporove performance.

ZONEREGIONSHOPCODEEXPRESSIONpeek()
Zone1Region11001count(distinct SHOPCODE)1
Zone1Region11002count(distinct SHOPCODE)1
Zone1Region21001count(distinct SHOPCODE)0
Zone1Region21002count(distinct SHOPCODE)0
Zone1Region21002count(distinct SHOPCODE)0
Zone1Region11001count(distinct SHOPCODE)0

I used the peek function but issue is that if I filter data on region level, the record is missed.

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
phaneendra_kunc
Partner - Specialist III
Partner - Specialist III

Gotcha.

Seems like your PEEK statement needs adjustment. If you notice peek marked first two shop codes 1001,1002 for region 1 and for rest it marked as 0 since i believe you are checking if shop code is not same then 1 else 0.

So as a solution you need to have 1's in all those rows correct?

Can you share your peek function?

With out using this peek may be you can try this appraoc as well.

Try creating a table with distinct Shop Codes and a counter flag (1 as flag).

so basically table will have below and that will connect to your fact shopcode as key. in UI all you have to do SUM(Flag)

Shopcode, flag

1001,1

1002,1

1003,1

1004,1

View solution in original post

4 Replies
phaneendra_kunc
Partner - Specialist III
Partner - Specialist III

How long it is taking to render? 15-20 mins for each selection?

Is there a reason you have to keep all 2 billion rows in one QVW?

Not sure i understood our problem on getting unique code and using a peek. Can you elaborate what you are trying to achieve.

noman212
Creator III
Creator III
Author

Dear Phaneendra,

Thanks for the reply.

1. Yup. it takes 5-10 minutes to evaluate expression and throws connection lost error.

2. It is sales data and since the data is to be analyzed for past 2-3 years, therefore a single dashboard file is used.

3. Let me again define the issue. I want to uniqely identify the shop based on dimension selected. To overcome the performance issue, i used the peek function to tag 1 or 0 against each shop and then finally use sum() to get unique shops. The issue is that 0 exist against shops for second region.

phaneendra_kunc
Partner - Specialist III
Partner - Specialist III

Gotcha.

Seems like your PEEK statement needs adjustment. If you notice peek marked first two shop codes 1001,1002 for region 1 and for rest it marked as 0 since i believe you are checking if shop code is not same then 1 else 0.

So as a solution you need to have 1's in all those rows correct?

Can you share your peek function?

With out using this peek may be you can try this appraoc as well.

Try creating a table with distinct Shop Codes and a counter flag (1 as flag).

so basically table will have below and that will connect to your fact shopcode as key. in UI all you have to do SUM(Flag)

Shopcode, flag

1001,1

1002,1

1003,1

1004,1

noman212
Creator III
Creator III
Author

Seems logical.

Let me try this i will get back to you if there is any discrepancy.