Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi all,
I have following pivot table.
Body | Style | Color | Date | | Type | Size | Size0 | Size1 | Size2 | Size3 | Size4 | Size5 | Size6 | Size7 | Size8 | Size9 | Size10 | Size11 | Size12 | Size13 | Size14 | Size15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5351N | BC5351 | 003 | 9/5/2012 | Qty | POS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 968 | 1936 | 1936 | 968 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Rolling Qty | POS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 968 | 1936 | 1936 | 968 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
9/6/2012 | Qty | SM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 497 | 784 | 837 | 469 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | SM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 497 | 784 | 837 | 469 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I would like to get rolling sum working. Im using following expressions so that at each date I have the Rolling Quantity Sum.
Qty: sum(SUMMARY.Quantity)
RollingQty: RangeSum (above(sum(SUMMARY.Quantity),0,RowNo()))
These formulas work when I don't use Type as Dimension.
Body | Style | Color | Date | Size | Size0 | Size1 | Size2 | Size3 | Size4 | Size5 | Size6 | Size7 | Size8 | Size9 | Size10 | Size11 | Size12 | Size13 | Size14 | Size15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5351N | BC5351 | 003 | 9/5/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 968 | 1936 | 1936 | 968 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 968 | 1936 | 1936 | 968 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 497 | 784 | 837 | 469 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1465 | 2720 | 2773 | 1437 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I realize that adding Type changes the way RowNo() behaves since we always get 1 as return value. I've tried sum(Total Summary.Quantity) however that doesn't have the outcome I'm expecting since at the next body/style I need to restart the rolling sum.
All help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Grif
NOTE: Values in Green are Orders, values in black are On hand and values in red are sales (not shown)
Try using:
RangeSum (above(TOTAL sum(SUMMARY.Quantity),0,RowNo(TOTAL)))
Hi MSheraton,
The only problem with this formula is that the rolling sum does not reset to zero when the color or the style changes.
SUMMARY.body | SUMMARY.style | Color | Datex | | SUMMARY.Account | Size | Size0 | Size1 | Size2 | Size3 | Size4 | Size5 | Size6 | Size7 | Size8 | Size9 | Size10 | Size11 | Size12 | Size13 | Size14 | Size15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5351N | BC5351 | 003 | 9/5/2012 | Qty | AR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 968 | 1936 | 1936 | 968 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Rolling Qty | AR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 968 | 1936 | 1936 | 968 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 497 | 784 | 837 | 469 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1465 | 2720 | 2773 | 1437 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
004 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 756 | 1387 | 1409 | 741 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2221 | 4107 | 4182 | 2178 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
005 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 316 | 644 | 708 | 341 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2537 | 4751 | 4890 | 2519 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
006 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 660 | 1233 | 1233 | 741 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3197 | 5984 | 6123 | 3260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
007 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3197 | 5984 | 6123 | 3260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
009 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 956 | 1778 | 1820 | 910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4153 | 7762 | 7943 | 4170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
017 | 9/5/2012 | Qty | AR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 668 | 1336 | 1336 | 668 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Rolling Qty | AR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4821 | 9098 | 9279 | 4838 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 131 | 134 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4821 | 9229 | 9413 | 4838 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
024 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 768 | 1452 | 1451 | 771 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5589 | 10681 | 10864 | 5609 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
099 | 9/6/2012 | Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rolling Qty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5589 | 10681 | 10864 | 5609 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For example when color changes from 003 to 004 the rolling Qty for color 004 should be 756 for size 3 and NOT 2221. It almost as if I want to use TOTAL but depend on the color as my breakdown.
Thanks,
Grif
Hi Grif,
I'm confused to what you're trying to achive.
Can you create an example table showing exactly how you'd expect the pivot table to look with the data you've already provided?
Mark
=aggr(RangeSum (above(sum(SUMMARY.Quantity),0,RowNo())), SUMMARY.body, SUMMARY.style, Color, Datex)
Hi Whiteline,
I tried your expression however its not giving me the result I want. Please refere to attached document.
Grif
Hi Mark,
I've attached the document. Please have a look at the top table. This is the outcome I want however I'm missing a Type dimension since when I add this dimention the expression doesn't work.
Grif.
Hi Grif,
whiteline gave the correct answer.
You incorrectly implmented it as
=aggr(RangeSum (above(sum(SUMMARY.Quantity),0,RowNo())), SUMMARY.body, SUMMARY.style, SUMMARY.color, SUMMARY.Date, SUMMARY.TransType,SUMMARY.SizeCode)
Try it again but drop (SUMMARY.TransType,SUMMARY.SizeCode)
ie:
AGGR(RangeSum (above(sum(SUMMARY.Quantity),0, RowNo())),SUMMARY.body,SUMMARY.style,SUMMARY.color,SUMMARY.Date)
Mark
Unfortinately, it seems that it doesn't work correctly.
I think because of using above() with aggr. It arragens the table some other way than the pivot does it.
For example it always uses load order to sort data.
Alos as I understand to drop SUMMARY.SizeCode dimension is not the case.
I tried dropping SizeCode and Type but it does not produce the desired result.
Whiteline if Pivot table doesn't work well with aggr then is there a way to get similar table (maybe a simple table)
Grif