Skip to main content
Announcements
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE: Thurs., Sept. 19, 1 AM ET, Platform will be unavailable for approx. 60 minutes.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

[Removing a value from table]

Hi,

my sum aggregate table looks something like this

A 100

B 131

C 165

D 188

E 1000000000

The numbers next to the A,B,C,D,E are the frequencies of them.

so when I make them into any graphs E dominates the whole chart and it makes all the other values meaningless.

I want to remove E temporarily and make chart only with frequency value of A, B, C, D

How Can I do that?

Thank you in advance!!

David

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Gysbert_Wassenaar

If you want to show results only for non-null values use sum({<MyField = {'*'}>}Amount)


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand

View solution in original post

7 Replies
narendiran
Partner - Creator
Partner - Creator

if A,B,C,D,E with a name Column1. =if (Column1 <> E, Column1) Or use set analysis. Hope this will help

Gysbert_Wassenaar

You can edit the script and add a where clause to exclude the value E and reload the document. Then when you're done remove the where clause and reload the document again. I don't recommend doing this. Instead use selections. First select E in a listbox and then right click that listbox and choose Select Excluded. You could create a bookmark for this selection for if you need it again. Or you can filter out E in a chart expression. Instead of sum(Amount) you can use sum({<MyField -= {'E'}>}Amount)


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
Not applicable
Author

Hi Narendiran,

Thank you for your reply.

Could you show me an example of how I can utilize set analysis? I know briefly what the set analysis is but I am not adapt at putting it into use yet.

Thank you!

susovan
Partner - Specialist
Partner - Specialist

Hi David,

You can also try this process,

7.JPG

9.JPG

Warm Regards,
Susovan
Not applicable
Author

Hi everyone who answered my question.

Thank you all very much. I tried all the methods mentioned above and learned from those.

but I should have mentioned that  the last value with large amount of counts were actually "others" and by that it means NULL.

susovan.g‌ 's method could not be used since no matter what I do, the 'other' will stay in it.

gwassenaar‌'s method could not be used since Null values does not show up in list box

but i took a way around and did

"Show only values that are" "smaller than" "15%" and got the table that I was expecting to get.

but I know this is just a temporary fix.

It would be great if you guys could tell me how I should use set analysis for this.

Thank you for replying and thank you in advance for the follow up question also.

Gysbert_Wassenaar

If you want to show results only for non-null values use sum({<MyField = {'*'}>}Amount)


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
Not applicable
Author

Thank you so much!!! I better get used to set analysis.