Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi All,
Using Set Analysis can we Exclude all the selections Except one field.
sum({1<FIELD1=FIELD1>} Sales) : This does not work.
Does any one have other alternatives.
Regards,
MAK
I played around a bit and this works now for me:
sum( {1 < Field3 = {$(=getfieldselections ( Field3 ))} >} Sales )
Just without the quotes! 😉
sum( {1<FIELD={Value} Sales>} This works but it is restricted to this Value. I want it to be depended on only one field selection.
Can any body do this?
to get all selection except set A, use {1-A}
I'm not sure if I understand what you want, but
sum( {1-$} Sales )
will summarize all except the selections.
As you said , {1-$} will give All except the selections.
Here is what I want exactly
If I make selections on Field1 , Field2 , Field3....., Field100.
I want to summarize by Ignoring all selections but Including Field3 Selection.
This will summarize all Sales values with the current Field3 selection:
sum( {1 < Field3 = {"$(=getfieldselections ( Field3 ))"} >} Sales )
Will work only if a single value is selected.
Thanks Ralf.
Is there any solution for Multiple Values?
I played around a bit and this works now for me:
sum( {1 < Field3 = {$(=getfieldselections ( Field3 ))} >} Sales )
Just without the quotes! 😉
Thanks Ralf,
I tried removing Quotes. It doesnt work.
Did you change anything else?
No. It depends on the values of Field3. Do you have values with blanks or strange chars?
This is my last idea:
sum( {1 < Field3 = {$(=getfieldselections ( Field3, ',', 100 ))} >} Sales ) // getfieldselections with comma separator, max 100 values (default is 6)
You can check the return of getfieldselections ( Field3, ',', 100 ) if you insert it as a formula. It should return a comma separated value list.