Skip to main content
Woohoo! Qlik Community has won “Best in Class Community” in the 2024 Khoros Kudos awards!
Announcements
Nov. 20th, Qlik Insider - Lakehouses: Driving the Future of Data & AI - PICK A SESSION
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Table viewer visibility

Hi all,

can I hide certain tables from table viewer? (tables that hold fields that only the GUI using)

for example , I want to hide 'Visiblity' Table in the view

thanks,

community.PNG

9 Replies
andrespa
Specialist
Specialist

I don't think so, but I'm not sure though. But I would say you can't do that.

Best regards,

Andrés

Not applicable
Author

I agree with Andrés! But, What you can do is fool the user resizing the Visibility table (draging it's border) to the smallest size and moving it to the same position of another table and then click on this other table.

Good luck!

Marcello

marcus_sommer

I'm not sure if it's a good idea to hide some parts of the datamodel. I don't see a benefit in doing this rather some risks of misinterpretations.

- Marcus

Not applicable
Author

I think it's a great idea.

If I have a module with 20 tables that their fields using only to determine GUI selections, they are only causing confusion to a regular user.

Jacob

Anil_Babu_Samineni

Might be Qlikview can't do hide any related dimensions from Table viewer.

Best Anil, When applicable please mark the correct/appropriate replies as "solution" (you can mark up to 3 "solutions". Please LIKE threads if the provided solution is helpful
avinashelite

I don't think its possible

Peter_Cammaert
Partner - Champion III
Partner - Champion III

What exactly are "regular users" going to do in/with your data model?

MayilVahanan

Hi

Instead of using Field for visible chart or hide, you can go with "Variables". So no new fields are not required for this.,

Thanks & Regards, Mayil Vahanan R
Please close the thread by marking correct answer & give likes if you like the post.
marcus_malinow
Partner - Specialist III
Partner - Specialist III

No, this isn't possible (though I'd be happy to be proven wrong!)

One possibility for you might be to create variables instead of fields.