Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Qlik Open Lakehouse is Now Generally Available! Discover the key highlights and partner resources here.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Test if it's in the possible values

Hello,

I have a graph where I have a dimension ("Categ").

This dimension has 2 values : "AAA" and "BBB". I have a list where I can select the "Categ".

When I select "AAA", I would like to display only the lines for "AAA".

This should be the normal behavior, but in my graph, I have column that use a "{1}" context.

Without selection :

error loading image

With selection :

error loading image

So, I want to change my dimension "Categ" to something like "if the current Categ is in the possible Categ regarding the current selection, then Categ".

I used a workaround with this formula :

=if(substringCount(aggr(concat(DISTINCT Categ),Categ), Categ) > 0, Categ)


but it's not "clean".

The result with the formula is OK :

error loading image

Is there another proper way ?

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
johnw
Champion III
Champion III

Simpler dimension approach:

Dimension = aggr(Categ,Categ)
Expressions = same as you have

But my impression based on some very minor testing is that calculated dimensions are rather slow. So I suspect that a more efficient approach would be this:

Dimension = Categ
Expressions = sum(Value)
if(len(Categ),sum({1} Total <Categ> Value))
if(len(Categ),sum({1} Total Value))

View solution in original post

3 Replies
johnw
Champion III
Champion III

Simpler dimension approach:

Dimension = aggr(Categ,Categ)
Expressions = same as you have

But my impression based on some very minor testing is that calculated dimensions are rather slow. So I suspect that a more efficient approach would be this:

Dimension = Categ
Expressions = sum(Value)
if(len(Categ),sum({1} Total <Categ> Value))
if(len(Categ),sum({1} Total Value))

Oleg_Troyansky
Partner Ambassador/MVP
Partner Ambassador/MVP

If you are on version 9, I'd recommend continue using Set Analysis and add a condition that Categ is one of the possible values. Instead of just {1}, your set analysis condition would look like:

{1 < Categ=P(Categ) > }

See attached example

Not applicable
Author

All the solutions you suggested work fine.

Thank you very much !