Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Qlik Open Lakehouse is Now Generally Available! Discover the key highlights and partner resources here.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sudarshan
Contributor II
Contributor II

Creating Canonical Date For Contracts Data[Start and End Date] and Active Sites [Site Closed Date]

Hi All, 

Good Morning! I have been working on a project in Qlik Sense and I think i might need Canonical Date to do this, but do let me know if you have other solutions.  So here goes: 

I am working on creating a dashboard to visualize the number of active contracts and active sites on a timeline. Here's the sample of the data : 

Sites Data
Active Site Count: 
Sudarshan_0-1686210451915.png

Here's the Aggregated Closed Date Dimension expression is: 

Sudarshan_1-1686210517938.png

And the MIN FCD (M)is: 

Sudarshan_2-1686210571821.png

So the logic of the Aggregated dimension is that: I want to find the minimum of the "Financially Closed Date" and "Actual Start Date", if it is null then i assign the date '12/31/2016', otherwise use the minimum date. 


Contracts Data:
Active Contracts:

Sudarshan_3-1686211139788.png

Here the Contract Month Dimension Expression is:

Sudarshan_4-1686211285549.png

And Valid Contracts Expression is :

Sudarshan_5-1686211321157.png



Now the difficulties I am facing:

These two table when plotted on separate charts work fine. But I have to calculate a 3rd measure called 'Contract Penetration' which is the active sites/active contracts  to find Penetration (%) and I want to plot this over a timeline(Monthly). 

These two have different dimension and I am not sure how to combine them. I tried reading through Canonical Date but not sure if it is applicable here directly.  Any suggestion would be helpful as I am stuck on this for more than  a week now! 

If you require more clarity on the question, I can gladly help!

Thanks in advance 

Best Regards

Sudarshan. 



 

 



Labels (5)
0 Replies